J302417

Diamonique & Simulated Ruby Eternity Band Ring,Platinum Clad

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Deleted $138.75

or 5 Easy Pays of $27.75

+ S&H and tax

Size:  

In Stock

Available on Waitlist

Sold Out

We're sorry.This item is not available at this time.

Pre Order Possible.

Wait Cancel

Low Stock

You May Also Like

You May Also Like

You May Also Like

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique & Simulated Ruby Eternity Band Ring,Platinum Clad is rated 3.7 out of 5 by 9.
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Simulated Ruby Ring This ring was beautiful in the picture, but when received, it did not come close to looking like a ruby. I bought two of them to wear on each side of my real ruby wedding band, but it wasn't even close. Also, it was uncomfortable to wear, very rough on the sides. I feared it would scratch my ring, so I sent them both back. Sadly, it really was a beautiful ring, but just could not pass as a ruby. Plus uncomfortable.
Date published: 2021-01-24
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Horrible It’s bending and two stones came out, only had it a few weeks
Date published: 2019-06-30
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Ruby Babies I have owned this ring for several years. Actually I own 2 of them. I'm a July baby so I'm all about rubies, Can never get enough of them. I use these rings to stack with each other or use my thinner Diamonique eternity bands on either side as well. I also use these rings as ring guards with other band rings & solitaires I own. The color of the simulated rubies is perfect. Not too red & certainly not pink.
Date published: 2016-09-06
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love! Yes the rubies are a little pink but thats what happens with simulated rubies and I don't even care. I love this ring! I love the design, I love the cut of the stones and the size of them. This ring is so believable and beautiful!! It just sparkles and is perfect for my wedding band!
Date published: 2015-08-25
Rated 5 out of 5 by from 5 stars for beauty... ...but 1 star for comfort. Unfortunately the sides and the prongs are rough and catch on clothes, hair, etc. It would be absolutely perfect in a channel setting. Regardless, I am going to keep it and the identical one I ordered in the blue sapphire. They look gorgeous together and I have had many compliments already. Just too bad they aren't more comfortable to wear.
Date published: 2014-01-07
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Don't recommend this ring if you love rubies! While the craftsmanship is good and the Diamonique stones are beautiful, same can't be said for the "rubies." The rubies are pink, not red and when I say pink I mean like a dark pink sapphire, not a ruby. The color is nothing like the photo. I was soooo looking forward for this ring! It is a great size and surprisingly comfortable. Sadly, It is going back.
Date published: 2013-01-14
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Uncomfortable! This is a really pretty ring but it was so scratchy between my fingers I couldn't wear it! The prongs all the way around are sharp and made my adjacent fingers sore after just a few hours. I had to send it back. Maybe a channel set next time. Disappointing!
Date published: 2012-12-31
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful large ring I bought this ring thinking that it was a total carat weight of 2.30 as the heading says. It is actually 4.60. I purchased it to try it out as a stacker with my platinum 2.57 e-ring and a 2.42 eternity. This ring overwhelms them. It is however, a beautiful ring, and I have had compliments on it. So, now I am not sure if I want a stacker ring, or a right hand ring of substantial size like this one in genuine stones. Really, this is so pretty I am not sure I need to drop the 10k to get this ring in diamonds and rubies. To me, the metal still looks like silver or in the very least brand new platinum, but no one seems to notice that but me. I am really really picky about jewelry, and usually prefer genuine stones, but this one is a keeper. It does look great stacked with just my eternity band. I don't think you can go wrong with this ring, a little pricey but beautiful!
Date published: 2012-02-05
  • y_2021, m_6, d_18, h_18
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.17
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_9
  • loc_, sid_J302417, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc