Diamonique 100-Facet 2.35 cttw Fancy Gallery Ring, Platinum Clad

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail

or 4 Easy Pays of $11.82

+ S&H and tax

Endless shimmer. This radiant ring dazzles with a bold-but-believable, round, prong-set, 2.00 carat cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond in a brilliant 100-facet cut. Additional round, bead-set Diamonique stones twinkle continuously at the sides and along the uniquely beautiful gallery. Wear the stunner alone, or coordinated with eternity guard rings or a simple wide band to receive compliments galore.

Regarded as the finest simulated gemstone available, Diamonique stones offer exceptional clarity and durability. Each flawless stone is precision cut for consistency and diamond-bright brilliance beyond compare.

Platinum Clad(R) sterling silver is polished sterling silver plated with platinum to create a timeless look at a fraction of the cost of platinum.

For more details on this ring's fit, please refer to the Ring Size Guide above.

  • Brightly polished platinum plated over sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 2.35 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Sizes 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; due to the special nature of the plating process, QVC does not recommend resizing by a jeweler
  • Fits true to size
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 3/4"W
  • Made in China

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 100-Facet 2.35 cttw Fancy Gallery Ring, Platinum Clad is rated 4.4 out of 5 by 531.
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Diamonds Too Small This ones going back. Diamonds on shank are tiny. Do not recommend this one if your looking for larger diamonds as shown.
Date published: 2017-08-23
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Disappointed I was very disappointed when I received this ring. I had been watching it on QVC for awhile and finally decided to buy it. There was no "tarnish square" in the envelope with the ring, and, while it was not tarnished, there was no sparkle to it whatsoever. The silver looked dull and the stones were completely lackluster. I debated on sending it back, but decided to try cleaning it first with my jewelry cleaner. It did not work. It is still dull and the stones do not shine. I have not sent it back, since I believe it is now too late, but I would not recommend this one.
Date published: 2017-08-09
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Stunning Looks gorgeous. I wear a size 4 and have petite hands. Lucky to get a size 4 in this piece. The ring looks beautiful on my small hands. Saw a review where a person with a large ring finger was complaining it looked fake. Not at all on my hand and I have real diamonds in good grades that this ring blows away. Love this ring
Date published: 2017-07-29
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Beautiful ring but... The ring is beautiful and true to size but the stone fell out in less than six months. Disappointed.
Date published: 2017-07-28
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Fancy Gallery Review If you like bling...you will Love this ring. I don't want to take it off!!! Everyone compliments me on my choice!
Date published: 2017-07-07
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Pretty but cheap Diamonique jewelry normally looks flawless, however this ring looked gaudy and cheap! Definitely returned!
Date published: 2017-06-30
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful! Elegant setting & realistic looking stone - all I was hoping for! Diamonique never disappoints me.
Date published: 2017-06-28
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful! I love this ring! It is very believable and easy to wear. I have had no trouble with it being in the way (due to the gallery), or hanging on anything. I saw a similar ring today on a lady and mine looked just as good. The platinum coating gives it a rich appearance while the stone is realistic.
Date published: 2017-06-26
  • y_2017, m_9, d_21, h_18
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_531
  • loc_, sid_J36991, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc