Women with Control Regular Renee's Reversibles Jeans

Not Eligible for Return or Exchanges

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
Deleted $82.95

or 5 Easy Pays of $5.80

+ S&H and tax


In Stock

Available on Waitlist

Sold Out

We're sorry.This item is not available at this time.

Pre Order Possible.

Wait Cancel

Low Stock

You May Also Like

You May Also Like

You May Also Like

Reviews & Community QA

Women with Control Regular Renee's Reversibles Jeans is rated 2.7 out of 5 by 9.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not reversible Just because you have a print on one side along with stenciled pockets does not make it reversible. The zipper works on the solid side. The hem illustrates the pants are inside out, not to mention the seaming. Double dark stitching on all seams. A good idea but very poorly executed. Can’t believe anyone would wear the floral side of these jeans in public even if you could get the zippper to work. A very bad case of advertising.
Date published: 2021-03-11
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Don't Buy Waste of money. Not good quality. Jeans are not size appropriate and the material is thin and wrinkles easy. I regret this purchase and will never buy this brand again. Simply ridiculous
Date published: 2021-03-01
Rated 5 out of 5 by from AWESOME I received these reverse jeans in Saturday, I have worn them 2 x on both sides and I love love them. I ordered the indigo in a size 12 reg, which is my normal size equivalent to a L, and the fit is great. The stretch is amazing and although I don't wear a size 10, in these I probably could have done so. But I am more than comfortable in the 12. I have no problems with the zipper or button on either side and reverse with ease. I am so glad I purchased these and I got them when they were $44 dollars (yay me)
Date published: 2020-11-04
Rated 2 out of 5 by from The smell associated with these is really bad Although these jeans fit fine, the intense smell of some chemical(s)l is so intense that after three (3) washing I cannot get the smell out. I will wear these around the house for fear the smell is so intense that it fills the room and would, I think, annoy others in a room.
Date published: 2020-01-11
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Run Small These run small and are truly skin tight. Fabric is very light as well but I like the idea of them being reversible. Was disappointed on the fit, I'm a 22W and 5'9" as I normally fit QVC sizes.
Date published: 2019-11-26
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Print is beautiful, but.... Love the print, but the rest of this jean is pretty much a "fail". This is my first pair of jeans by Renee. My size 4 fits well and the print is lovely BUT it ends there for quality and they are far overpriced. They are awkward to button as needed on inside to wear printed side, the zipper catches while zipping up or back down, the denim is a strange feel for denim yet OK. This isn't my first try of a reversible jean (large retail store purchase) and the button and zipper issues were the same. I really wish these were a pull-on jegging thus eliminating the problems stated above. These would be almost perfect if they were just a pull-on jean!
Date published: 2019-11-13
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Worse purchase ever of WWC anything! Once they were washed and worn they collapsed. The knee shape would not go away! Have to return.
Date published: 2019-11-13
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Disappointed I just received these jeans and opened the package and tried them on. Long story short, they are being returned. I have 3 pairs of WWC reversible pants and love them. However, the jeans seemed to miss the mark. While being shown on TV, I noticed the light areas on the solid side and was a little skeptical and holding them confirmed my suspicions. The material in my normal size 14 fit but looks like it will rip or tear easily which I don't want. Also, the zipper doesn't look sturdy enough to hold up when switching from one side to the other. Maybe if they were pulled on it would work better. :(
Date published: 2019-11-02
  • y_2021, m_6, d_18, h_18
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.17
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_9
  • loc_, sid_A371682, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc