Women with Control Regular Manhattan Ankle Pants with Side Slit

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

or 5 Easy Pays of $1.88

+ S&H and tax


In Stock

Available on Waitlist

Sold Out

We're sorry.This item is not available at this time.

Pre Order Possible.

Wait Cancel

Low Stock

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Reviews & Community QA

Women with Control Regular Manhattan Ankle Pants with Side Slit is rated 2.9 out of 5 by 9.
Rated 2 out of 5 by from upper thigh H ave many Women With Control pants of all lengths. Love them for comfort,material and style. However some of them I receive have more material in the the upper thigh area. I know most women have thighs, I do not . Therefore the upper thigh has extra material that sticks out and looks rediculous. These happen to be those..Otherwise love all others I receive. I cannot always tell which pair they are because most always the description says follows the line of the body
Date published: 2020-06-14
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Maybe for lounge I bought these hoping I could wear them to work but the material and cut of them look more like pajama or lounge pants. Not worth the process of going through a return. I will keep for lounge.
Date published: 2020-04-10
Rated 2 out of 5 by from HUGE Thighs I own too many WWC pants to count. I usually take an XL or 1X. In checking the garment chart, they always run larger in XL than 1X which never made sense to me, but it's never been a deal breaker. BUT these are even larger in the thighs than what the chart says. They flare out at the hip. They are cut oddly.
Date published: 2020-04-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Comfortable and flattering I love these pants. They feel so wonderful and the color is beautiful. I've never been disappointed with WWC pants.
Date published: 2020-03-19
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love the fit, love the fabric, love the look! I wore these for the first time today, and was over the moon happy with how they fit -- and how I felt. I wear a Medium, and slipped them on like they were made for me. fit was great -- slim, but not "sausage-like". Love the length, and the ankle slit. I came home from the event I attended and popped onto QVC to order a second pair. Thank you, Renee, they're perfection.
Date published: 2019-10-08
Rated 2 out of 5 by from ginormous thighs I'm 5'7'' and wear a large. I found that the waist was fine and the length was ok, a little longer than ankle for me. But the problem I have is with the thigh part of these pants. Look like saddle bags, too large for the rest of the pant leg.This material just makes the pant look sloppy with that extra loose thigh. I washed them hoping they'd re-size a bit, but sadly too baggy on my upper leg. Will need longer tunics to hide the excess material. Had planned to buy more if they looked good but I will stop with this one pair, which I'll wear around the house and yard.
Date published: 2019-09-26
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Leg Opening To Big I’m Larger Sizes!!! RENEE!!!! PLEASE READ THIS REVIEW - YOU CAN BE THE ONE TO CHANGE THIS - WHY WHEN I BUY ALL THESE NICE ANKLE PANTS IN A LARGE, are the LEG OPENINGS SO MUCH BIGGER THAN THE SMALLER SIZES????? I know that a bigger girl usually has bigger ankles, but not that big!! We want the same look of a SLIM LEG pant as the thin girls!!!! I won’t buy these as usual, I can plainly see on the video, that this is the case yet again!!! I think Clinton Kelly is the only designer that is a bit better about this. PLEASE STOP THE MADNESS!!! We want a slim leg pant like the thin girls!!!!!!!!!
Date published: 2019-08-23
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Nice fitting at the legs, hips But small at the waist. The length is perfect for me at 5’4 and the fabric is soft and comfortable.
Date published: 2019-08-20
  • y_2020, m_11, d_27, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.12
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_9
  • loc_, sid_A366044, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc