A297708

Susan Graver Regular Premium Stretch Pants with Tulip Hem

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail
$55.00

or 6 Easy Pays of $7.29

+ S&H and tax

Color:  
Size:  
Description
A sweet tulip hem gives these stylish Premium Stretch pants that little something extra. From Susan Graver.

  • Fabrication: Premium Stretch: high-stretch, cotton-rich jersey knit for ultimate comfort and flattering fit
  • Features: tulip hem, two front pockets with zipper closure, two back pockets, full elastic waistband
  • Rise: slightly below the waist
  • Fit: semi-fitted; follows the lines of the body with added wearing ease
  • Leg Shape: slim leg; fits close to the body through the entire leg
  • Inseam: missy/plus inseam 30"
  • Content: 88% cotton/12% spandex
  • Care: machine wash, tumble dry
  • Imported

To see the specific garment measurements for this item, click here.

Tune in to QVC for Susan Graver Style

Sunday, December 16, 2018 from 7 – 8 a.m. ET and Friday, December 21, 2018 from 4 – 6 p.m. ET and Thursday, December 27, 2018 from 4 – 5 p.m. ET

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Susan Graver Regular Premium Stretch Pants with Tulip Hem is rated 3.4 out of 5 by 12.
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Fit off a bit for me I love this fabric and it's hard to find dressy navy trousers in the mall, so I like the color. But, dern! It's so hard to find real slim leg pants that aren't skin-tight leggings! I guess it's my fault in assessing the descriptions, but these are still too baggy for me and I sent back another style a week ago. Just going to live with them. They are a bit slimmer, but still loose from the butt to the ankle. Not a bell, but with the tulip hem (which would be lovely if a bit shorter on me) it seems to flare out even more over the top of the foot. Because the fabric and style are good for professional wear and church, I am keeping because. hey!, I can't afford to send back Too Many pairs in the trying!
Date published: 2018-12-01
Rated 5 out of 5 by from THE BEST PANT great fabric, and awesome cut. Please make more colors Susan and keep these coming!
Date published: 2018-10-06
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Worth the money! I kept debating whether I wanted to purchase these pants b/c I always have a hard time finding really NICE well made casual/dress pants but I decided to try a pair of these Tulip Hem pants & I LOVE them! They do fit "snug" around my leg area BUT Susan puts the right amount of stretch in these pants that they really don't feel tight @ all! I LOVE they way they pull my tummy in b/c I"ve had 3 major surgeries thru my tummy & I have this little "pouch" area & these pants pull me in so it's not as noticeable which I am EXTREMELY happy about b/c I'm so self-conscious of it! LOL! I bought the black & I'm going to purchase the Navy & Green in the near future! I've always purchased Susan's leggings which I LOVE as well but now I'm hooked on these pants! LOL! Susan I hope u consider making these pants in white & burgundy colors! Keep making these beautiful pieces Susan!
Date published: 2018-02-27
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Wanted to like I ordered a large in black - my usual for most SG pants. I like the waistband, covert pockets with zippers, and the tulip leg opening... If only this pant was in a textured liquid knit I would not return it. I consider this a legging weight material that is loose; there are also hips in the pants that I dont have. If I ordered a size down, the pant would be too short.
Date published: 2018-02-21
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Terrible Quality Control I have had these pants a little over a month and worn them 1 time. Went to work and noticed the seam was not fully stitched. Finally found someone with a needle and thread at work and repaired. No big deal-stuff happens. When to wear them this morning and yep-towards the bottom of the pants- seam not fully stitched. Again. No longer eligible to return them so am stuck. Susan, please do something about the lack of quality control as I am very disappointed.
Date published: 2018-02-15
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Wanted to love these pants When I first ordered these pants they were on wait list. Finally got the size that would fit by the chart measurements. They were too snug in the legs. Reordered the small. fit was good, but way too long and no easy way to hem. There was also a small (dime -size) hole at the top of a back pocket. Back they go. Not going to try for a third time as it takes forever to get product. Have a lot of Susan Graver, usually great product, but have been returning more lately. where is the quality/size control?
Date published: 2018-02-08
Rated 5 out of 5 by from PLEASE RESTOCK THIS ITEM SUSAN! I just received these pants today. They were a wait-list order which I forgot about. So glad QVC sent them to me and didn't forget that I wait-listed them. I ordered a small and find them to fit true to size. They do fit close to the body but the fabric is fabulous - substantial but soft! The tulip hem is stunning with pumps or heeled boots. If you're tired of leggings, this pant is a nice alternative. I went on QVC right away to order three more, to find that unfortunately they are limited in sizes. PLEASE RESTOCK THIS ITEM SUSAN! You repeatedly say on the air, you read the reviews . . . I truly hope you read this one!
Date published: 2017-11-29
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not flattering I was extremely hopeful these pants would look 1/2 as good on me as the models. I was extremely wrong. The bottom of the pants were to wide to show off the split design. Also, I’m 5’ 3 1/2” and a 27” inseam is too short for petite. So I tried the regular which I always wear so I can wear boots or mid-heels. I can usually work around lengths. It’s the design that was a miss. I think this tulip/split design would work on Susan’s leggings - they’re not super tight and the leg opening would be better.
Date published: 2017-11-10
  • y_2018, m_12, d_13, h_16
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.9
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_12
  • loc_, sid_A297708, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc