A372114

Reebok Men's Training Sneakers - Flexagon Force 2.0

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

$59.95

or 5 Easy Pays of $11.99

+ S&H and tax

Color:  
Size:  

In Stock

Available on Waitlist

Sold Out

We're sorry.This item is not available at this time.

Pre Order Possible.

Wait Cancel

Low Stock

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Reviews & Community QA

Reebok Men's Training Sneakers - Flexagon Force 2.0 is rated 4.2 out of 5 by 327.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Very comfortable. I needed a shoe that would be comfortable to work out in, walk outside, and even an everyday shoe. It fits all those. Love the foam insert.
Date published: 2020-10-20
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Good deal Good sneaker, quality and price. Sneakers were a gift and went well!!
Date published: 2020-10-13
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Good looking shoe Shoe has a great style and is comfortable. I normally get a size 12 with the Zig and a size 12 with this shoe was a little small but still fit
Date published: 2020-10-13
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Great for indoor training loved these. fit and comfort were great. the soles seem a little soft for extensive outdoor use and the inside of the upper against my Achilles developed a hole on both feet after about 6 months of daily use.
Date published: 2020-10-13
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great product for price Light weight shoe , very comfortable to wear. Great price.
Date published: 2020-10-13
Rated 5 out of 5 by from pefect Great pair of shoes for the gym. Very comfortable and very stylish too. Will definily buy my next pair from here.
Date published: 2020-10-11
Rated 5 out of 5 by from very slick and cool they are very stylish and cool and very good for running
Date published: 2020-10-10
Rated 2 out of 5 by from did not meet reebok standards I had a Flexagon from two years back and it was very comfortable and almost perfect in every aspect. This one is no where close. Its narrower and longer. Its also not that soft. I had to keep it since I already used it. But turned out to not be the best decision.
Date published: 2020-09-29
  • y_2020, m_10, d_30, h_16
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.12
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_327
  • loc_, sid_A372114, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc