LOGO by Lori Goldstein Rayon 230 Top with Ruffle Asymmetric Hem

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail

This seemingly simple top saves some surprises for the bottom, with an asymmetric ruffle hem and a pocket on the side. From LOGO by Lori Goldstein®.

  • Fabrication:230 rayon knit
  • Features: scoop neckline, long sleeves, center seam detail on front and back, asymmetric ruffle hem, pocket on front above hem
  • Fit: semi-fitted through the bust and waist, follows the lines of the body with added wearing ease; flares to A-line bottom opening
  • Length: missy length 25-1/4" to 27-3/8"; plus length 27-3/4" to 29-1/2"
  • Content: body 95% rayon/5% spandex; lower panel 100% polyester
  • Care: machine wash, tumble dry
  • Imported

To see the specific garment measurements for this item, click here.

Tune in to QVC for LOGO by Lori Goldstein(R)

Saturday, October 26, 2019 from 4 – 5 p.m. ET and Monday, October 28, 2019 from 1 – 2 p.m. ET and Monday, November 4, 2019 from 1 – 2 p.m. ET

Reviews & Community QA

LOGO by Lori Goldstein Rayon 230 Top with Ruffle Asymmetric Hem is rated 4.2 out of 5 by 21.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Surprise I was skeptical being a plus size but gave it a try. To my surprise the fit was perfect and hid my problem areas. So glad I bought this
Date published: 2019-08-16
Rated 3 out of 5 by from LOGO Shirts I really wish Lori would design these shirts (all of her items) in TALL sizes. I guarantee you, she would sell even more of her beautiful clothes. I’m 5’9” and a little chubby, I need Tall sizing, not wide sizing. Thanks for listening to a “Much Wanting LOGO” person! DawnTracy
Date published: 2019-08-10
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Not for Me I got this in red berry. It's more of an orange to my eye. And the style doesn't look particularly good on me. I am large chested and it makes this top hang like a big round dress - too long for pants but not long enough for leggings. I wore it twice and felt like I should be in a circus. I think it is such a super cute top and on the right person, it's probably great. Unfortunately, I'm not that person.
Date published: 2019-01-20
Rated 5 out of 5 by from I love this top One of my favorite Logo purchases ever. Cut so well, fits great, and even a petite person (I'm 5'1") can wear it. Really elegant in the black.
Date published: 2018-11-18
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Absolutely Love This One! I have purchased many pieces of clothing from the LOGO line however, I like this one so much that I HAD to write a review! I got it in black and it looks very flattering and utterly adorable with jeans:) I just wish it was available in a variety of fall/winter colors soI could have purchased another one or two.
Date published: 2018-10-13
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Cute top I am a size small and the small fits true to size. It is a lighter weight top, I ordered the red berry to match the embroidery on my denim vest but the color is more of an orange red and not the berry red shown on the video. I will keep it anyway because it is so darn cute.
Date published: 2018-09-28
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Poor quality Lately I have been disappointed in the quality of Logo clothing. I have several older items which I have been happy with. Quality for the price was good. It seems I am returning most of what looks very good on tv and on line, not so when received. Increased prices lower quality is not what I would expect from logo. Sorry going back. I might add that you need to be at least 5'8" for her tops to not fit like a dress. It maybe would be a good idea to offer more petites.
Date published: 2018-09-23
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Now I have a Dilema! I missed this top on Shawn Killenger's show; it has never been presented on Lori's shows. When I finally found it online it was completely sold out. So I stalked it for weeks. Finally, I got the black and the gold; fits perfectly in my usual medium. It is wonderful, darling, charming; I love it. But it has caused a problem. Should I also get the red? That would be ridiculous. Wouldn't it? Or would it?
Date published: 2018-08-31
  • y_2019, m_8, d_19, h_19
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.13
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_21
  • loc_, sid_A309802, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc