Kingman Turquoise & 2.45 cttw Gemstone Ring Sterling

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail

Radiantly royal, this ring enthralls with a Kingman turquoise amidst a halo of white zircon and rhodolite gemstones.

  • Sterling silver
  • Total gemstone weight is approximately 2.45 carats; gemstone weight is not given for turquoise
  • Prong-set, oval Kingman turquoise; prong-set, round white zircon and marquise-shaped rhodolite halo; split shank; polished
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
  • Measures approximately 1"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Kingman Turquoise & 2.45 cttw Gemstone Ring Sterling is rated 2.8 out of 5 by 4.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful ring This is one of the prettiest rings I have ever owned. I will wear it proudly. It represents my birthday and my granddaughter’s.
Date published: 2018-06-07
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Very pretty I received my ring a couple of days ago. Its very attractive and substantial . The turquoise has some matrix in it, and a pretty blue. The zircon and rhodolite are very sparkly! Happy with this ring.
Date published: 2018-05-20
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not as shown The ring I received was a very poor specimen of turquoise. The stone was a very pale blue color with a small dot of black on the edge and was not polished. There was no shine at all. The light blue created no contrast to the outer ring of red/pink and was not attractive like the photo at all. I realize all stones are different because of natural variation but the difference between the photo and what I received was so drastic that it made it unacceptable.
Date published: 2018-05-20
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Kingman ring Just delivered today. Upon opening mailer it was sent in.Ring has a noticeable "gash" in the turquoise. Very dull looking ring overall. A huge disappointment! Light weight and cheap looking for the money. Nothing like the ring displayed on TV! It was not in the bag, hanging out , it might have been a return by someone else.
Date published: 2018-05-17
  • y_2018, m_7, d_19, h_19
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_4
  • loc_, sid_J354056, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc