J355419

Judith Ripka Sterling Doublet & Diamonique Ring

Judith Ripka Sterling Doublet & Diamonique Ring
product thumbnail
$234.95

Color:  
Size:  
Description
An enchanting round doublet anchors this colorful ring, with an amazing array of cubic zirconia Diamonique simulated diamonds to complete the captivating design. From Judith Ripka.

  • Sterling silver
  • Gemstone weight is not given for doublet
  • Total Diamonique® simulated diamond weight is approximately 1.10 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Round doublet with cubic zirconia or synthetic quartz top and mother-of-pearl back; prong- and bezel-set Diamonique simulated diamonds with rope and berge motifs; tapered shank with twisted rope berge motif
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
  • Measures approximately 3/4"L x 7/8"W
  • Imported

Tune in to QVC for Judith Ripka Jewelry

Tuesday, September 4, 2018 from 1 – 3 a.m., 5 – 6 a.m. ET

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Judith Ripka Sterling Doublet & Diamonique Ring is rated 2.0 out of 5 by 2.
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Once again.. It's a beautiful ring but it doesn't fit. This time my size fits too big, it spins on my finger. The last Ripka ring I bought in my size was too small and was a tight fit. I'm tired of buying her rings that do not fit properly. I'm very disappointed. I know I could take it to a jeweler and get it sized but for this price, I shouldn't have to do that. I think I may be done buying Ripka rings. At least with her necklaces and earrings there is no size to worry about.
Date published: 2018-06-11
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Top heavy I just received this ring in the pink size 6. I love the look but the top is heavy and the band is too thin to support the ring from rocking back and forth on finger. It needed more sliver on the band to counter weight the top of ring. Yet another disappointment in this designer's items. Did anyone put this ring on to see how it performed before bringing it to QVC? Did QVC quality control check it out before giving approval? It's a pretty design so I gave it two stars for that but it needs to be counter balanced. Yet another return for quality/design/size issues.
Date published: 2018-06-06
  • y_2018, m_8, d_19, h_14
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_2
  • loc_, sid_J355419, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc