J385357

Judith Ripka Cultured Pearl with Diamonique Halo Ring

Judith Ripka Cultured Pearl with Diamonique Halo Ring
product thumbnail
$99.50

or 5 Easy Pays of $19.90

+ S&H and tax

Option:  
Three cultured freshwater pearls crown the top of this oval ring, resplendent with a cubic zirconia Diamonique® simulated diamond halo. From Judith Ripka.

  • Sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique® simulated diamond weight is approximately 8/10 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Cultured freshwater pearls measure approximately 6.5mm
  • Oval design; row of three cultured freshwater pearls; prong-set Diamonique simulated diamond halo; South Hampton and berge motifs
  • Measures approximately 1"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

Reviews & Community QA

Judith Ripka Cultured Pearl with Diamonique Halo Ring is rated 3.4 out of 5 by 5.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Simply stunning I love this little beauty!!! Judith Ripka is one of my favorite designers and I adore pearls so this was a no brainer. I find myself wearing it far more than I expected. Give it a try!
Date published: 2019-05-23
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Like an Edwardian Era Engagement Ring I’ve seen I love the design of this lovely pearl & diamond-look ring. Yes, it’s lighter weight & daintier than most of my (hundreds of) Ripka rings (that I’ve collected over many years) but it’s still a beautiful piece with an estate style to it. I felt compelled to take one star off because the middle pearl on the ring I received was set/lower (?!) than the other two & I’m finicky about such details (so sadly, I just returned it). I originally ordered this in a larger size for my middle & pointer fingers, but since the ring is daintier than I expected (because I’m a big rings gal), I’ll try/order another one in a smaller size to fit my ring finger. As a huuuuuge rocks ‘n rings gal (genetically, no, seriously! Since I was little! Just like my Mom & Grans!), I most usually lean towards big & bold rings, but I still love the ‘more normal’ sized & daintier rings in the estate piece styles like this one. From Victorian to Art Deco, I love ‘em all. Thanks to the amazingly talented and beautiful Judith Ripka (& the Q), I’m usually decked out like a queen, whether I choose the big & bold or the daintier estate stuff. Compliments always happen! But dear, darlin’, classy Judy, please bring this style (tho bigger?!) with RED CZs where the pearls are? &or blue, green or rare colors of Diamonique! THNX! LOVE YA!
Date published: 2019-04-20
Rated 5 out of 5 by from My favorite! I'm happy I didn't listen to some of the reviews because I absolutely love this ring! I own over 60 of Judith's pieces and this one is one of my favorites. Some reviewers thought it was lightweight but I disagree. I couldn't be happier with my purchase!
Date published: 2018-12-03
Rated 2 out of 5 by from I really wanted to love this ring I received this ring today and it just wasn't as substantial to me as the photos showed. It was pretty light weight and I am used to Ripka pieces being heavier - I suppose the price reflects this (at $99.00). The pearls were also not set evenly - the middle pearl was set lower than the two surrounding pearls - that just bothered me too much. Next time I will choose more wisely. I do own and love Judith's current sterling silver and turquoise doublet ring (J347895) - now that one has some weight and presence! I will continue to seek out future Ripka jewelry and while it was a miss for me, I do not regret trying this ring out.
Date published: 2018-11-08
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Cheap Sorry to have to say, but this ring looks so very cheap. Has NO weight . So very thin. I like weight to my jewelry. It least know I have it on. Also, it is a little strange , when I write a review that isn't favourable, qvc can't post at this time ? Try again !
Date published: 2018-11-03
  • y_2019, m_8, d_19, h_19
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.13
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_5
  • loc_, sid_J385357, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc