J348831

Judith Ripka 14K Set of 3 1/8 cttw Diamond Stack Rings

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail
$667.75

or 6 Easy Pays of $99.99

+ S&H and tax

Option:  

9 Months Qcard Special Financing ™

Offer Ends09/30 Details
Description
Whether you slip on one, two, or all three, this set of stack rings make a fabulous finishing touch to any ensemble. From Judith Ripka.

  • Includes three stack rings
  • 14K yellow gold
  • Total diamond weight is approximately 1/8 carat; diamond weights are minimum weights
  • Bezel-set, white diamonds with berge motifs; two rings with one diamond, one ring with two diamonds
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
  • Measures approximately 1/8"L x 7/8"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Judith Ripka 14K Set of 3 1/8 cttw Diamond Stack Rings is rated 3.8 out of 5 by 8.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Petite but beautiful I bought these when they first came out and wondered if I would keep them, they were expensive. I wear these rings every day, they are perfect and the diamonds although tiny have a lot of fire, the rings as someone said they will bend, they do not and have not. I love these rings. I am older and have almost stopped wearing jewelry but these are on my finger everyday.
Date published: 2018-03-22
Rated 1 out of 5 by from So small they are almost invisible These are the most inconsequential rings I have ever seen. There is so little gold that they could not possibly hold their shape over the long term. The diamonds are little slivers. This is not the trendy petite jewelry we are seeing. It looks like rings created for infants. There is no way Judith Ripken could be proud of this execution. No substance, bad stones, poor balance. Could not wait to send them back. These pieces do not even have the diamonique guarantee. Sheesh.
Date published: 2018-01-25
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Gorgeous stack rings I recently received these beautiful rings...they are exactly what I’ve been looking for. I have many stack ring in various metals, some with gemstones and some without. These rings are thin, but very sturdy. The diamonds are very sparkly. I mix and match them with other rings on a daily basis. I highly recommend!
Date published: 2018-01-16
Rated 1 out of 5 by from For a child? Can barely see it. Not good for the price. Color of the gold is awful.
Date published: 2017-12-20
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Rings are my thing I had been looking at these rings for quite a while now, and just received as a gift.. Saw Leah Williams rings and was taken aback. Don't know if they are the same or not, but thought I would give these a try. So glad I did, just love them. Still wondering though if these are the same as what Leah Williams wear.
Date published: 2017-11-17
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Versatile Stack Bands I haven't taken these rings off since I got them. Using them with all kinds of other Judith Ripka diamond rings - they're absolutely beautiful and the diamonds are very sparkly!
Date published: 2017-11-13
Rated 3 out of 5 by from LIFELESS AND THIN THESE THREE RINGS HAVE NO FIRE IN THE DIAMONDS AND ARE PAPER THIN. I KNOW TIFFANY SHOWS THIN RINGS, BUT THEIR THIN, IS SUBSTANTIAL. THESE ARE NOT. THEY ARE INCONSEQUENTIAL. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE. I DO NOT HAVE LONG FINGERS BUT JUDITH USUALLY DOES A GOOD JOB WITH HER DIAMONDS EVEN IF THE GOLD HAS LITTLE WEIGHT. THE SPARKLE MAKES UP FOR IT. NOT THIS TIME. I WILL PROBABLY SEND THESE BACK BECAUSE ALONE IT DOES NOT SHOW UP AND ALL THREE TOGETHER, IT SHOWS VERY LITTLE. THIS DESIGN HAS POTENTIAL......JUST ADD SOME WEIGHT TO YOUR GOLD, JUDITH!
Date published: 2017-10-20
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Quietly elegant Petite but beautifully executed. Looks like a small cross on the finger. LOVE!
Date published: 2017-08-23
  • y_2018, m_7, d_19, h_19
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_8
  • loc_, sid_J348831, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc