JUDITH Classic Sterling 3-Stone 12.50cttw Diamo

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Deleted $184.00

or 5 Easy Pays of $25.00

+ S&H and tax


In Stock

Available on Waitlist

Sold Out

We're sorry.This item is not available at this time.

Pre Order Possible.

Wait Cancel

Low Stock


You May Also Like

Complete the Look

Reviews & Community QA

Judith Ripka Sterling 3-Stone 12.50cttw Diamonique Ring is rated 4.4 out of 5 by 11.
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Stone out! Yes, it is beautiful and of significant size. It is not for the faint at heart. Firstly, for the JR it is kind of thin silver. Not like before she retired from QVC, the jewelry was quite hefty with weight and thick. Now it is very thin and kind of flimsy, not like before. Lastly, the second week the stone fell out. I returned it now waiting on the replacement hoping this was a fluke! I guess we’ll see!
Date published: 2021-04-20
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Simply beautiful design This rings setting is such a stand out!!! It is my favorite piece for the detail alone! However one minor issue the first one I ordered the stone had fallen out in the box when I received it. I sent it back. Ordered a new one, and still the prongs are a bit loose, I can hear the stones move. I love it so much I’ll probably just take it to my jeweler. I don’t want to wait for a 3rd and have the same issue. But that’s just how much I love it, I’ll pay to have it fixed.
Date published: 2020-09-03
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Wow! It looks fabulous! I have large hands, so they size is just right for me. Impressive!
Date published: 2020-06-08
Rated 2 out of 5 by from SO FAKE I had big hopes! I wear a large diamond and a large canary diamond. I love the cushion cut and thought to give it a whirl. This is so dull... no sparkle unless in very high lighting. FAKE FAKE FAKE.
Date published: 2018-10-04
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful ring I'm on the fence due to the size of the ring. But this ring is gorgeous and if you don't mind thats its unrealistic, then go for this rung. The sparkle is amazing!
Date published: 2017-10-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful! The sparkle outstanding the bridge is a little high for me but the detail is so beautiful I can overlook it. Ordered a nine my regular QVC size and it was too large but I see the 8 is gone so I will keep the nine.
Date published: 2017-06-21
Rated 4 out of 5 by from TOO BIG I received this ring about two days ago and I've been wearing it. I'm torn between keeping it and sending it back. It is a HUGE piece and it IS weighty. It's so big that people would DEFINITELY have a hard time believing it's real. I guess that's how I buy my jewelry, it HAS to be believable and this ring isn't, for me. Maybe it may be believable for someone else. Undecided on whether to return or not. I gave it 4 stars instead of 5 because it is TOO HUGE for me, at least at this time. I may keep it and rock after I've sold a few houses (I'm a Realtor) and it APPEARS that I can afford such extravagance.
Date published: 2017-06-18
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Holy Sparkle! This ring is ridiculous gorgeous! I realize at 12 carats is big, but I love it! If you can rock a big ring with confidence this is for you! I was amazed at the quality and attention to detail. The quality of the cut, the workmanship on the band, the weight of the piece are impeccable. I am not even sure how then can afford to make something like this at this price. Although it's a monster sparkler I am surprised how many people ask me if it is real and I do catch women and men staring at my hand! Oh what fun and that's exactly what this piece is!
Date published: 2015-07-12
  • y_2021, m_6, d_18, h_18
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.17
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_11
  • loc_, sid_J336821, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc