J354763

Imperial Silver Mirror Wheat Band Ring, Sterling Silver

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail
$39.92

Comparable Retail Value: $47.00

or 2 Easy Pays of $19.96

+ S&H and tax Good until August 22, 2018 2:59 a.m. ET

Option:  
Description
The stunning beauty of this gleaming mirror wheat band ring reflects in your polished look and good taste. From Imperial Silver.

  • Sterling silver
  • Wheat design; beaded border; tapered shank; polished finish
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Imperial Silver Mirror Wheat Band Ring, Sterling Silver is rated 3.4 out of 5 by 11.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from My new every day favorite ring Everything is right in this ring. Very pretty design. Comfortable width. It is slightly flexible, just enough to feel comfortable on a finger. I am thinking of buying the second one because I has lost recently my very flexible white gold ring which was also made by Imperial Gold.
Date published: 2018-08-12
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Cheap CHeap CHEAP DId I say cheaply made and the so-called silver looks like tin? And as others have noted, this is not at all flexible and is absolutely NOTHING like the old Imperial Gold from years gone by. I tried it on, I took it off, I bagged it back up, I dropped it off at my local USPS.
Date published: 2018-06-13
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Bright ring Pretty style with a nice width ring for casual wear.
Date published: 2018-06-07
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Not flexible like their gold If you are looking for the flexible kind you will have to go with white gold. Their silver; while it is a beautiful ring, is not flexible at all! I bought it to wear on my thumb; I have a yellow gold one that I have had for years and I adore it but the silver is just not in the same league. You would have to buy this one true to your size as the wheat part is stiff and offers little movement. It runs a tad small as well. I ordered a 9 because of this, however, an 8 would be too tight and the 9 too loose. An 8 might have worked if it were flexible. Also ladies, please remember, when returning items you do not have to use the expensive return label. I make a stop at the post office and can return for half the cost on lighter items.
Date published: 2018-06-04
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love this I have several Imperial Gold rings and love them. This is a great addition to the collection!
Date published: 2018-06-03
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful Ring Received this ring after waiting for it on waitlist. I think it's beautiful, shiny and the size fit was perfect. Don't understand why some reviews say it's tiny.....it's definitely a substantial size. Now I just hope it stays shiny for a long time.
Date published: 2018-06-03
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Disappointed After being on waitlist I finally received this ring today. I am disappointed. I have the Imperial Gold wheat ring in the gold and love it. It's beautiful. I love to stack and mix colors so I was planning to wear the two of them together. However this one looks nothing like the gold one. I'm not sure I would call it a wheat ring but I can tell you there is a huge difference between this one and the gold one. Had I seen this somewhere other than on QVC I wouldn't have guessed they were made by the same company. It is already packaged and ready to go back. So far from the 3 things I've ordered in the Imperial Silver line I'm not impressed. The quality and style are nowhere near the gold line,
Date published: 2018-06-02
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Garbage This is Garbage,Went To wear the ring it broke..Really..I'm seriously thinking of sending back the Gold One..Linda what is going on???
Date published: 2018-06-01
  • y_2018, m_8, d_19, h_14
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_11
  • loc_, sid_J354763, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc