G.I.L.I. Set of 2 Knit Obi Wrap Belts

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

or 3 Easy Pays of $11.70

+ S&H and tax


In Stock

Available on Waitlist

Sold Out

We're sorry.This item is not available at this time.

Pre Order Possible.

Wait Cancel

Low Stock

Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete

Reviews & Community QA

G.I.L.I. Set of 2 Knit Obi Wrap Belts is rated 2.5 out of 5 by 4.
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Need more structure Really wanted to love these, as I don't often find belts in plus size. But unfortunately these are just too flimsy to be effective and would be perfect if there was just some structure in the fabric, in the widest portion of the belt. Sizing was great, but the fabric belt just didn't work as expected.
Date published: 2021-05-28
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Cloth Belt I wish this had a slit so that you could feed the belt through it. As it is, it just criss-crosses in the back and is messy looking. The fabric was nice and the size was right, but I will not be keeping.
Date published: 2020-06-08
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Poor material it just keeps folding over Just don't like this belt in this material. It just kept lumping. I don't know what's going on at QVC warehouse or distribution center. I'm surprised I got the package. Maybe the outer label was correct, but the paperwork was for someone in Southern California. I realized it at the last minute after securing the return package. Had another persons name and address on the included paperwork. Whew that would be hard to explain or get my return money. Yikes.
Date published: 2020-05-21
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Needs Boning Or Stays, Mine Rolls The idea of this comfy knit obi belt is great, but the execution could use some tweaking. My belt rolls to the center so it appears just about an inch tall, and adds bulk because of the rolled fabric. If it had stays or was stiffer to keep the vertical width it would be much more flattering. If you're not a sloucher these might work better for you.
Date published: 2020-05-19
  • y_2021, m_6, d_18, h_18
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.17
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_4
  • loc_, sid_A377853, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc