J110216

Diamonique 3.00 ct tw 100-Facet Stud Earrings,1 4K Gold

Diamonique 3.00 ct tw 100-Facet Stud Earrings,1 4K Gold
product thumbnail
$129.00

Option:  
Description
Timeless elegance meets supreme sparkle. These traditional stud earrings capture both light and attention from every angle, glowing with round, 100-facet cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamonds in prong settings.

Yellow Gold or White Gold.

  • 14K gold
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 3.00 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Post and clutch, for pierced ears only
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 1/4"W

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 3.00 ct tw 100-Facet Stud Earrings,1 4K Gold is rated 2.8 out of 5 by 12.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Don’t buy The post is too narrow for the hole in the backs. Tried using backs from other earrings and none fit. Going back. Should have listened to the other reviewers who said the backs don’t fit. Even worse, the post is too flimsy to adequately support the setting. I can see it breaking off if it gets caught in clothing. QVC jewelry quality is not even close to what it always was, no more Quality in the Q.
Date published: 2018-06-11
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Little disappointed.... The setting around the stone is not very substantial compare to other studs that I purchased in the past. I have a number of 14K yellow golds studs that I purchased over the years that I have been shopping with QVC and the gold setting made much more of a statement. I kept these earrings because I wanted the white gold but wish they had not skimped on the setting. They are very bright with much sparkle!! I would recommend these but be aware of the less substantial setting.....
Date published: 2018-02-23
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Only 2 Carats, Not 3 Carats Gorgeous earrings. I purchased because I wanted a larger size other than my 2 carat post earrings, 1 carat each earring. These are a little smaller than 1 carat each, therefore, NOT 3 carats total. Back they go.
Date published: 2015-11-06
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful and Believable These earrings have tons of sparkle and fire and are a believable larger size. They shine through my long hair and look expensive. I have no issues with the backs and am thrilled with the quality.
Date published: 2015-07-08
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Beautiful but post broke off after 4 months These earrings are beautiful but the workmanship is terrible. The post fell off one of the earrings after only 4 months. The return policy says 30 days, so now I am stuck with one earring only. It's a shame because they are beautiful. I would not recommend these earrings unless QVC would make it right and send me another one to match the one I have.
Date published: 2015-06-24
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not size expected I ordered the 3 ctw Diamonique studs and they appear much smaller than I expected for 1.5 carats each. I will immediately return.
Date published: 2015-03-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love my new earrings! These earrings are the perfect size and they shine brilliantly! I absolutely love them! I have received many compliments on the sparkle they exude. I have seen previous comments regarding the backs on them. I don't seem to have any problem with them; perhaps my ear lobes are thicker so they stay on better. Thanks QVC for the wonderful earrings!
Date published: 2014-06-19
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Love these, except for ... These earrings are beautiful, very sparkly, more so than the ones that are not facet cut. I had a pair of Diamonique studs that were not the 100 facet that I wore every day for years, until I lost one. That was the reason for this new purchase. However, as with the other pair, I am VERY disappointed in the backings on them and the way they lay on your ear. They do droop down so you cannot see the diamond very well and you are always wanting to make them tighter. So, as with the last pair I had, I will go to Target or WalMart and buy the backings that have the disks attached to the little back piece so they hold them up better. Hopefully they will fit on these.
Date published: 2014-05-22
  • y_2018, m_7, d_16, h_19
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_12
  • loc_, sid_J110216, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc