Diamonique 2.00 cttw Solitaire Ring, 14K White Gold

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail

Comparable Retail Value: $194.00

Simply stated, this solitaire cubic zirconia Diamonique simulated diamond ring adds a spot of sparkle to any look.

  • 14K white gold
  • Total Diamonique(R) simulated diamond weight is approximately 2.00 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Raised, prong-set Diamonique simulated diamond at center; polished, rounded band
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
  • Band measures approximately 1/8"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 2.00 cttw Solitaire Ring, 14K White Gold is rated 4.1 out of 5 by 10.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love it Great replacement. Looks as good as my old diamond.
Date published: 2018-09-25
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love it! I love, love, love the ring but I had to exchange for a larger size.
Date published: 2018-07-17
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Beautiful ring Beautiful ring; looks real! Size runs a little large.
Date published: 2018-02-10
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Very thin band portion I purchased this ring in the 2ct to wear as an alternate once in awhile to my own 2ct round brilliant solitaire. Initially was shipped the 1 ct size, but when I re-ordered it I was shipped the 2ct. The DMQ stone itself is beautiful,and I love that his has SIX prongs versus four like other round solitaires offered on qvc.com that are offered with 14 k white gold. However, I am so disappointed since the band, shank, and gallery are so tiny and thin that the ring looks funny to me. (It almost looks like one free floating stone since the band is barely visible?) Also, since this band is so skinny, it wont match up with my own eternity band, or any of the DMQ eternity bands I have collected over the years. I'd love this exact DMQ stone offered with a band that is slightly more substantial. (I am not looking for bold or weighty, but just not so incredibly thin). band and shank are too thin to pair next to my o
Date published: 2017-12-31
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Stunning I originally purchased the round in my normal size and it was a bit too tight. Sine the round was on waitlist I exchanged it for a pear shape and I could not be happier! The pear is so much more than the round, I ordered a size larger and its fits closer to my normal size. The shank is very thin as is the band as other have stated, you can't really see that on tv or the website. I don't see anything wrong with it. The stone is set lower, short prongs, it does make it a bit unappealing if you have a band other than something plain, which is what I have and my preference. I think anything with diamonds takes away from the beauty of the stone, but a personal preference. All around I love it, it is stunning and a great buy!
Date published: 2017-10-19
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Needs Higher Prongs I purchased this as an alternate to my 2 Ct Engagement ring. Prongs too short to fit nicely against my eternity wedding band. Also the gold band is very thin, and the shank even thinner.
Date published: 2017-09-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful Ring I brought this in the white gold 2k Asscher cut. It is simply beautiful. I love that this is real gold and yes while a thinner band, I enjoy that sometimes. The Diamonique stone looks so real. Sparkles all around - so happy !!!
Date published: 2017-09-28
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Very Pretty but band is Super thin I receive this ring today and I will say I was a little disappointed and should have listened to the other reviews it's a very beautiful ring but the band is so thin it's just hard to fit up against other bands because it's so thin there's just no thickness to the ring for the price I'm going to return it but if you're someone looking for a very dainty ring then this rings for you.
Date published: 2017-09-28
  • y_2018, m_10, d_20, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_10
  • loc_, sid_J348878, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc