J350004

Diamonique 2.00 ct Eternity Band Ring, 14K Gold

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail
$186.00

Comparable Retail Value: $209.00

Color:  
Size:  
Description
For special occasions, as a wedding band, or for every day, this 14K gold Diamonique simulated diamond eternity band shines on its own or stacks perfectly with other favorites.

  • 14K gold
  • Total Diamonique(R) simulated diamond weight is approximately 2.00 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Prong-set, round Diamonique simulated diamonds around entire ring; polished
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
  • Measures approximately 1/8"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 2.00 ct Eternity Band Ring, 14K Gold is rated 3.4 out of 5 by 9.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Thumb Ring LOVE IT. I had to exchange for a smaller size but, will more than likely order another one once the size is right!
Date published: 2018-06-07
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love This Band I purchased several eternity rings in Diamonique, sterling silver 14 karat clad etc. but I really wanted a real 14k eternity band. Recently, I purchased this in the 14 karat yellow gold, and I absolutely love it! It does not scratch my fingers, it catches the light beautifully, it’s not too heavy like a sterling silver would be, I can wear it all the time even doing dishes or cooking etc. and not have to worry about it. I also like the guarantee for the stones should something happen. I have now ordered the white gold one to go with my 3 carat 14 karat white gold setting solitaire. I like to change my jewelry out yellow gold and white gold. Just a sidenote, I also have the 14 karat yellow and the white gold three stone Rings, And this eternity band looks beautiful with that Also. I get lots of compliments from people. Well worth the price.
Date published: 2018-05-23
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Poor Quality I just received this ring yesterday and I can’t return it fast enough. Very cheaply made. The setting of the stones is cheaply done. Don’t waste your money on this ring. Also the gold is very thin. It looks fake, like something out of a bubble gum machine.
Date published: 2018-05-19
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Pretty ring Pretty ring off the finger. Ring is very uncomfortable looks to wide on finger! Waiting for a thinner 5 stone band
Date published: 2018-02-27
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Gorgeous ... Very pretty ring - however the diamonds are quite small compared to my almost 2 carat solitaire - so they didn't look right together - and I've returned it.
Date published: 2018-02-13
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Perfect I read the negative reviews and I am happy to say that the ring I got is perfectly fine. I got the yellow gold and sparkles nicely and is set evenly. I paired it with the 100 facet 14k yellow gold 2ct solitaire. Nice alone, paired with another ring or stacked. This one is a keeper.
Date published: 2017-09-10
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Cheap Setting The amount of gold on this ring is a joke. Feels and looks cheap. The stones are not set evenly as well. I've been wasting so much money returning things lately. The settings need to be heavier on the diamonique rings. Sending another ring back.
Date published: 2017-08-24
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Stone set unevenly When this ring arrived I noticed right away that stones were set unevenly in height. If you look at the photos from the item description, you will notice that there are three stones on the bottom of the ring that are either missing, or set so low in the setting that you cannot see them. How did this pass inspection? I considered requesting a replacement and giving the ring another chance but it is also quite scratchy and uncomfortable between the fingers.
Date published: 2017-08-24
  • y_2018, m_8, d_18, h_13
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_9
  • loc_, sid_J350004, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc