Diamonique 100-Facet 3.00 cttw Stud Earrings, Platinum Clad

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail

Pure sophistication. Beautifully believable, these 3.00 carat total weight studs shine with a prong-set, 100-facet cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond in each ear. And the pair is gift boxed, making these earrings the perfect treat for someone special.

Platinum Clad(R) sterling silver is polished sterling silver plated with platinum to create a timeless look at a fraction of the cost of platinum.

  • Brightly polished platinum plated over sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 3.00 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Stud earrings with round, prong-set, 100-facet Diamonique simulated diamonds; highly polished finish
  • Post and clutch, for pierced ears only
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 1/4"W
  • Gift box
  • Made in China/Thailand

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 100-Facet 3.00 cttw Stud Earrings, Platinum Clad is rated 4.0 out of 5 by 156.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Brilliant sparkle Having lost several pairs of genuine diamond studs I now wear these Diamonique studs with confidence. They look authentic and I don't think anyone would detect that they aren't real diamonds. This is a great product and a go-to item in my jewelry box. Thank you QVC!
Date published: 2018-09-14
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Great sparkle! I had read the other reviews, and I understand their thinking on the posts. They could be a little thicker, so you have to be careful putting them on. The backings are way too small for the size of the earring, but, if you use the "magic-backs" on the earrings, they sit PERFECTLY on your ear. They do have plenty of sparkle. I do have real 3C diamond earrings, (in the safe deposit box), and I went to the bank and compared the size. They are EXACTLY the same size. QVC cannot make a claim unless they have verified everything. Their quality control is difficult to get buy, so sellers really do have to be careful. They check out everything. I am going to keep them, because they do sparkle a lot, and, if I lose one, I am not out that much. Would request QVC look at the quality of the post. Really! "Q" you can do better than that! Worth buying , just remember they are bigger and need proper support on your ears. The only thin part of my body, (I swear) are my earlobes!
Date published: 2018-09-11
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Pretty but concerned Received these several days ago and the stones are very pretty and sparkle. My concern is the posts, they are thin and bend easily. The butterfly back is small and if you push too hard or miss, the posts bend. If the posts were better quality, they would be perfect.
Date published: 2018-09-10
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Setting I have had these for appox one yr. Stones are very brilliant but setting is not sturdy. One of the posts broke off. I don’t remember ever having a post break off on a quality earring.
Date published: 2018-09-09
Rated 3 out of 5 by from SMALLER THAN EXPECTED These earrings were very pretty, but much smaller than I expected for a 3 Carat total weight earring. If you like small studs, these are for you. I returned only for the fact that they were too small for me.
Date published: 2018-08-12
Rated 1 out of 5 by from 1 ct size and broke anyway I’m pretty sure what I got was a 1 ct size so I guess that 2ct tw but I ordered 3 ct. I tried in anyway and the peg broke off the earring! It’s like 99 cent store quality. Maybe worse becayse if bought cheap earrings through the years and never has anything broken when I tried them on or before wearing out!
Date published: 2018-06-24
Rated 1 out of 5 by from What A Disappointment! I'm not sure how these earrings could be considered 3.00 carat total weight. They're smaller than the 2.00 carat total weight diamonique earrings I purchased many years ago. Not mention, the stone quality looks so fake and both posts were bent upon arrival. Absolutely sending these back. This product line isn't what it used to be. Won't be buying again.
Date published: 2018-06-20
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Pretty Pretty earrings, not too small, not too big, just right. Lots of sparkle.
Date published: 2018-05-30
  • y_2018, m_10, d_20, h_14
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_156
  • loc_, sid_J268101, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc