J377580

Diamonique 1.55 cttw Double Bypass Ring, Platinum Clad

Diamonique 1.55 cttw Double Bypass Ring, Platinum Clad
product thumbnail
$60.00

Option:  
Description
Give off a glamorous glimmer when you slip on this spectacular bypass ring.

  • Polished platinum plated over sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique(R) simulated diamond weight is approximately 1.55 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Two round Diamonique simulated diamonds in center; round Diamonique simulated diamonds on crossover band
  • Standard fit; sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; due to the special nature of the plating process, QVC does not recommend resizing by a jeweler
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 1.55 cttw Double Bypass Ring, Platinum Clad is rated 3.8 out of 5 by 10.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Stunningly beautiful This ring is absolutely stunning!! It sparkles and shines and isn’t too big .. I was going to use this as a replacement for my wedding set as it’s too small. I’ve decided on a ring I think fits better for me personally. But this ring could still work as a wedding set or a right hand ring ! It’s definitely worth ordering if your on the wall thinking about it, go ahead and jump.. it’s brillantly beautiful!
Date published: 2018-10-12
Rated 5 out of 5 by from So Believable! I finally ordered this ring after keeping it on my wishlist. Im so glad I did. This ring is a perfect scale for believability. The stones are not too big and the setting is well balanced. I ordered my usual size 6 and it fits great. Im actually a 5-1/2 but over the years my knuckles have become larger so I need a 6. I love the no-tarnish platinum finish. The center stones beautifully sparkle. This is now my wedding ring replacement since the original no longer fits. It is gorgeous!
Date published: 2018-09-18
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Super happy with this purchase In addition to looking lovely, this ring is perfectly balanced. It does not turn on my ring finger like most do. The fit is snug; and the side stones do not irritate other fingers. I totally forget that it is on my finger ... until someone else notices the ring ... which they often do. Would happily buy this design again in gold clad.
Date published: 2018-04-18
Rated 2 out of 5 by from no sparkle..nothing like the picture The picture of this ring looks beautiful which led me to purchase it, but once I got it home I hated it. The ring had no sparkle to it at all and the the two middle diamonds looked like one big diamond. The side diamonds are so tiny and no shine to it at all. The shape of the ring is nice. I wish the side diamonds were somewhat bigger and the the two middle diamonds you couldnt tell that there are two.
Date published: 2017-06-20
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Disappointed Very disappointed with this ring. Looks inexpensive. Poor quality and no sparkle at all. Lately, I am not sure what is happening with the jewelry at QVC. It is not the same anymore. Going back..
Date published: 2017-06-14
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful! Can't go wrong with this beauty. So believable. I'm wearing it on my right hand but would look great as a wedding band. Center stones are a perfect size.
Date published: 2017-06-11
Rated 1 out of 5 by from CHEAP LOOKING!!!! I'm not sure what happened to QVC but lately there jewelry is horrible!!! Very disappointed!
Date published: 2017-06-10
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Stunning This is a really beautiful ring. If I could change anything I would make the color a g instead of e to increase the believability. The size of the stones and the proportion is spot on, and while it's bold, it isn't clunky. I was surprised at how comfortable it is to wear. It's very sparkly. As far as quality, we'll see in time. All in all I'm really pleased with this purchase. The easy pay option is great for those of us on a budget.
Date published: 2017-06-09
  • y_2018, m_10, d_20, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_10
  • loc_, sid_J377580, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc