Diamonique 1.50 cttw 3 Stone Ring, Platinum Clad

Diamonique 1.50 cttw 3 Stone Ring, Platinum Clad
product thumbnail

or 6 Easy Pays of $9.50

+ S&H and tax

Get your gleam on with this dazzling three-stone ring. A large, round, prong-set cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond sits in the center of the highly polished piece. Two smaller round, prong-set Diamonique simulated diamonds flank the larger stone, creating a must-have beauty.

Platinum Clad(R) sterling silver is polished sterling silver plated with platinum to create a timeless look at a fraction of the cost of platinum.

For more details on this ring's fit, please refer to the Ring Size Guide above.

  • Brightly polished platinum plated over sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 1.50 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Open gallery
  • Sizes 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; due to the special nature of the plating process, QVC does not recommend resizing by a jeweler
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 3/4"W
  • Made in China

Tune in to QVC for Jewelry Gifts

Thursday, December 13, 2018 from 2 – 3 a.m. ET and Monday, December 17, 2018 from 1 – 3 a.m. ET

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 1.50 cttw 3 Stone Ring, Platinum Clad is rated 4.5 out of 5 by 81.
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Satisfied So, keep in mind I just received this ring--so I cannot comment on durability. But I will check back in if something goes wrong and update my post. I believe a picture speaks a thousand words...So I'm posting some pics for you to view.
Date published: 2018-11-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful This ring is very beautiful but I will be sending it back I was looking for smaller stones, so I thought this ring will be it. It's just not for me
Date published: 2018-10-06
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Beautiful! Ring is beautiful. Just the right size stones. Lost the center stone from a very similar ring I purchased from QVC a few years ago so was thrilled to see this one. Only thing is the other one had a more decorated gallery and slimmer band which I prefer but love this one anyway!
Date published: 2018-08-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Gorgeous ring I bought this ring because I have been wanting a 1 ctw 3 stone ring but can't afford to pay several thousand dollars. This is a good size, beautiful, and a lovely fit with my plain comfort fit band. In some light it almost looks too perfect, but at a glance it looks like genuine diamonds. It's set in a low profile which is important to me. I'm very pleased with this purchase.
Date published: 2018-06-19
Rated 5 out of 5 by from LOVELY PETITE RING This ring is Outstanding in style and quality. After 51 years, my engagement ring has become outdated and no longer fits me. The center stone is set in a box-like gallery with one smaller stone in a heart on each side. The internet describes this setting as," a vintage/antique design", which is still okay with me since it has sentimental value. However, rather than simply resizing it so I can wear it again, I'm looking forward to wearing a more modern design that will look good with my channel-set wedding band.This Diamonique 1.50 cttw 3 Stone Ring has stones that sparkle like genuine diamonds and are not overwhelming in size.They are completely believable and fit nicely paired with my wedding band. I'm in Love all over again with the same guy!! Thank you QVC, Diamonique,(and Jimbo too). My only regret is that I overestimated my new ring size. Guessing that I now wear a size 8, (slightly too big). I'll gladly reorder a size 7 at this price it's a 'steal' for 'genuine' diamonds. LOL My fault for not using the Ring Guide. Perhaps, one of my granddaughters will be pleased to inherit my "vintage/antique" design engagement ring -- I'll let one of them resize it.
Date published: 2018-05-23
Rated 2 out of 5 by from NOT LIKE THE ONE I ORDERED YEARS AGO I had ordered a similar Diamonique ring years ago and still have it. Noticed the Diamonique looks more like glass now and appears fake, whereas the old one looks more like a realistic diamond. Was very disappointed I had to return this ring.
Date published: 2017-12-24
Rated 5 out of 5 by from JUST WHAT I'VE BEEN LOOKING FOR After losing weight, I lost My Original Engagement Ring, from 1962. I looked for one, even slightly similar, with no luck. I've had rings from QVC, in the past. I wanted a real Diamond, but tried QVC, just in case. Not only is My ring almost identical, to My original, but it holds up, through everything (including Daily target practice, and riding My motorcycle), and continues to look brand new. I find Myself holding it up, to the Sunlight, and artificial light, constantly, just to watch it sparkle. THANK YOU, QVC!
Date published: 2017-12-10
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Platinum clad disappointing The diamonique stones themselves look great with all the sparkle we've come to expect. I was very disappointed however in the "platinum clad" band. I have purchased several similar pieces in the past and was always pleased with durability. Not sure how or why the platinum cladding process has changed but the band on this ring showed very visible "scratches" after the first time I wore it. I would recommend that manufacturers return to the higher quality process.
Date published: 2017-09-29
  • y_2018, m_12, d_10, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.9
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_81
  • loc_, sid_J111662, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc