Diamonique 1.50 cttw 3 Stone Princess Cut Ring,Platinum Clad

Diamonique 1.50 cttw 3 Stone Princess Cut Ring,Platinum Clad
product thumbnail

A tempting trio. Give in to your craving for a dazzling accessory with this three-stone ring. A large, princess-cut cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond sits in the center of the highly polished piece. Two smaller princess-cut, prong-set Diamonique simulated diamonds flank the larger stone, creating a must-have beauty.

Platinum Clad(R) sterling silver is polished sterling silver plated with platinum to create a timeless look at a fraction of the cost of platinum.

For more details on this ring's fit, please refer to the Ring Size Guide above.

  • Brightly polished platinum plated over sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 1.50 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Open gallery
  • Sizes 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; due to the special nature of the plating process, QVC does not recommend resizing by a jeweler
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 3/4"W
  • Made in China

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 1.50 cttw 3 Stone Princess Cut Ring,Platinum Clad is rated 4.3 out of 5 by 100.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Too Big and Looks Fake I've been ordering rings from qvc for 15 Yrs, I'm a size a size 8 and never had a problem with the size, I ordered this to replace part of my wedding ring my husband purchased from qvc that I lost. My wedding ring was beautiful, this looks fake and it's too big. it keeps turning to the side. Not worth 60 dollars and they should inform customers to size down. Very disappointed in purchase. I will be returning.
Date published: 2018-07-05
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Not what I wanted Although this ring is very pretty, I chose to return it because it just wasn’t what I thought it would look like. The stones were smaller than I thought and they were set too close together without any spacing in between them. Someone else might absolutely love this ring, however, it just wasn’t for me.
Date published: 2018-05-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful Love this ring. Easy to wear. A real sparkler but very believable.
Date published: 2018-05-03
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Perfect! Received this ring yesterday and I love it. It has an impressive sparkle to it and is extremely comfortable on my finger. I am wearing it with a thin, diamond wedding band. So glad I made this purchase. I normally take a size 4.5 but upon reading the reviews about the sizing being a little large, I ordered the 4 and it fits nicely. Hope my review is helpful. I love it!
Date published: 2018-03-29
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Gorgeous This ring is absolutely gorgeous. I would have given it 5 stars but the size is slightly larger than my actual size. Thank God for spacers :)
Date published: 2018-03-06
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Cute readorable ring Here is the most honest review I could come up with. Obviously when you purchase this ring, you know it's not a "real" diamond because you bought it. However, after wearing this ring for about 2 weeks as my engagement ring (I work in tough setting with chemicals and lots of pipes and steel), Everyone has noticed how much this ring sparkles, the size doesn't make people question if it's real which is very nice. I was specifically looking for a smaller 3 stone ring, that had a low profile (because I wear work gloves all the time), that was affordable in case of any issues. So far this ring is everything I expected it to be and alittle more since the cladding has also held up so far.
Date published: 2017-11-24
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Nice for the price I ordered this to switch out from wearing yellow gold all the time. The stones have a lot of sparkle to them, they look realistic. The ring size does run a bit big. I normally wear a 6 but this is a little roomy but it is ok. A nice ring for a good price.
Date published: 2017-10-20
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Sending back The stones need to be more balanced. Center stone oversized and doesn’t look square. The side stones look like emerald cuts. Wanted more of an anniversary style. Thin band. Disappointed.
Date published: 2017-10-06
  • y_2018, m_7, d_19, h_19
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_100
  • loc_, sid_J111656, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc