J325066

Diamonique 1.00ct Solitaire Ring, 14K Gold

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail
$199.75

Retail Value: $265.00

or 6 Easy Pays of $33.29

+ S&H and tax Good until July 23, 2018 3:59 a.m. ET

Color:  
Size:  
Description
Round radiance. This 14K gold solitaire ring features a cubic zirconia Diamonique simulated diamond, plus two rows of bead-set Diamonique(R) simulated diamonds to add a little extra sparkle.

White Gold or Yellow Gold.

For more details on this ring's fit, please refer to the Ring Size Guide above.

  • 14K gold
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weights are approximate: Center 1.00 carat; Sides 1/5 carat; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Prong-set, round Diamonique simulated diamond in center; two rows of bead-set, round Diamonique simulated diamonds on shoulder; polished shank; open galleries
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 1.00ct Solitaire Ring, 14K Gold is rated 4.3 out of 5 by 39.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from how pleased i am with this RING I have in white gold your small stones sides, they do not show up as well but give a gliter in all light. The sun makes them stand out while the main stone is great I'm wearing with my band with diamonds works perfect. This is a keeper !!
Date published: 2018-01-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Excellent Wow!!! Beautuful...More beautiful in person than the video
Date published: 2017-12-13
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Beautiful Ring I bought this ring 3 months ago. I lost my original 14k engagement ring years ago. This is very similar to the ring I lost. When I became engaged 25 years ago, yellow gold was "in". It's now, very difficult to find 14k gold in a size 5, with a believable stone, at an affordable price. When I opened the box, it took me back to all those years ago, when husband proposed. The only reason I didn't give it 5 stars is that the prongs are not white gold.
Date published: 2017-12-06
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Very Disappointed Suppose to be 14k but not stamped anywhere on the ring. Looks very cheap. Sending back. I've had sterling silver look better then this...dont waist your money. I've also found that none of the rings that are suppose to be14k are not stamped unless the rings are $5000 or more. Seems not quite right wouldn't you say????
Date published: 2017-10-29
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Looks Chintzy I bought this because it looked beautiful on tv. When I received it, it looked very cheap and chintzy. Don't waste your money. Pay a little more and invest in Moissanite
Date published: 2017-10-27
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Not A Fan... This ring has an overall pretty look, but the stone looked extremely fake to me. It had a weird blue hue to it, no matter if I was inside or outside in natural lighting. Definitely did not sparkle like it did during the presentation. I also ordered a 1ct, and the stone is gigantic. I'm not sure if I was mistakenly sent the wrong size, but if I wasn't, then this stone is way too large to be a believable 1 ct. The band is hollowed out, not solid gold, and I feel that for a $200 price tag, the ring feels kind of cheap. Overall, I wasn't happy with this item, and it is being returned.
Date published: 2017-10-11
Rated 5 out of 5 by from An Absokute YES! My fiancé and I purchased this ring because we are saving for a house. I didn't want him to spend so much money on a ring at this moment. That being said, I'm not sure I'll want another ring!!! The 1 carat is so unbelievable stunning and believable. The sparkle is incredible. Wonderful quality and has an absolute "wow" factor! Highly recommend!!
Date published: 2017-08-26
Rated 5 out of 5 by from So great I just have to write a review! Believable. Stunning and gorgeous and worth the cost and more. I am very pleased.
Date published: 2017-06-10
  • y_2018, m_7, d_21, h_19
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_39
  • loc_, sid_J325066, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc