Diamonique 1.00 cttw 100-Facet Solitaire Ring,Platinum Clad

Diamonique 1.00 cttw 100-Facet Solitaire Ring,Platinum Clad
product thumbnail

or 6 Easy Pays of $9.17

+ S&H and tax Good until December 16, 2018 7:59 p.m. ET

Classic elegance never goes out of style. This gorgeous ring sparkles with a round, 100-facet cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond in a simple six-prong setting. The highly polished band completes the sophisticated look.

Platinum Clad(R) sterling silver is polished sterling silver plated with platinum to create a timeless look at a fraction of the cost of platinum.

  • Brightly polished platinum plated over sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 1.00 carat; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Sizes 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; due to the special nature of the plating process, QVC does not recommend resizing by a jeweler
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 3/4"W
  • Made in China

Tune in to QVC for Jewelry Gifts

Monday, December 17, 2018 from 1 – 3 a.m. ET

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 1.00 cttw 100-Facet Solitaire Ring,Platinum Clad is rated 4.0 out of 5 by 39.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love it! It shines like a real diamond, confy fit, 100 facet is the right choice for me.
Date published: 2018-04-22
Rated 5 out of 5 by from My new Diamonique Ring I was more than thrilled when I got my ring. It's a 1.00 carat with 100-facet solitaire and it looks absolutely beautiful! Diamonique came through for me!
Date published: 2018-01-09
Rated 3 out of 5 by from 100 facet solitare I ordered this ring and opened it up and it sparkles beautifully however it is a 4 prong ring not a 6 prong like the description said. Definitely irritated
Date published: 2017-11-20
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Love it This ring is amazing. I bought diamonique many years ago and its still clear and looks just like my real diamonds. But what makes this ring special is the 6 prong setting and the 100 facet on the stone make this a amazing ring. The only thing is i wish i had bought this exact ring in white gold rather that plat over the sterling silver. I recommend being pretty careful and wear only when you are doing normal everyday things. But no work like house cleaning or though things. I do have a few scratches in the back of the ring. So i will be carefull in the future when wearing this particular ring. But the stone is amazing. My son even commented on it. His words were WOW it's sparkley and is it real? Lol thats the first time he ever commented on any of my jewelry. Love it. I gave this a 4 only because of the plat over silver. I will probably order one in gold because i love it and want to wear all the time. Dont want to worry about the plating
Date published: 2017-08-16
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Ring I Have Always Wanred I have been a Diamonique Wearer for about 25 years. I recently lost 50 pounds. Because of weight loss I needed to replace wedding ring. I chose this one because it is simple and beautiful. I wear it with an 8mm silver band and it looks fabulous.
Date published: 2017-06-02
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Beautiful Ring Just Defective The one small solitaire under two cttw and it turns out defective. The stone isn't centered and the prongs look like they are going to break. I've only had the ring for a day. I'm disappointed because my last Diamonique purchase was over ten years ago and the rings still look great. I just need a smaller size.
Date published: 2017-04-09
Rated 3 out of 5 by from stone is loose! One of the prong in my ring came broken and the stone is loose! But, the ring is beautiful and sparkles a lot! I will return mine because the stone will get lost as soon as I ware it! But if you are luck to receive a perfect one this is a very pretty ring!
Date published: 2017-04-03
Rated 3 out of 5 by from It's Okay I love the ring. It's simple, just what I was looking for but within a week its starting to loose it's shine, scratches very easily. I take it off before I put my hands in water because I didn't want it to loose its luster. Somewhat disappointed.
Date published: 2016-11-16
  • y_2018, m_12, d_14, h_14
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.9
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_39
  • loc_, sid_J112402, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc