Diamonique 1.00 ct tw Asscher Stud Earrings, 14K Gold

Diamonique 1.00 ct tw Asscher Stud Earrings, 14K Gold
product thumbnail

A cut above. Simply sophisticated, these wear-anywhere stud earrings are designed with an Asscher-cut cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond prong set in 14K gold.

Yellow Gold or White Gold.

  • 14K gold
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 1.00 carat; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Post and clutch, for pierced ears only
  • Measures approximately 1/8"L x 1/8"W

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 1.00 ct tw Asscher Stud Earrings, 14K Gold is rated 4.2 out of 5 by 19.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Perfect Little Earring Very Sparkly, small enough to wear every single day. I'm really happy with this purchase
Date published: 2014-07-19
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Why Did I Waste My Time Buying These? I received these earrings last week and was very disappointed....I know they're not real, but they really do look worse than if they were made of glass...very dull....I didn't give up on Diamonique quality, though...Yes, I will be sending these back to QVC, but, determined to find a pair that look almost real, I ordered item #J268410 - Diamonique 100 facet 2 ct tw stud earrings in 14k white gold....Received them this morning....They truly are beautiful...As a lover, like most women are, of real "diamonds", these earrings are very close to being the real deal!!!...So glad I gave "diamonique" another chance... :)
Date published: 2014-02-25
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Great look! I love the size and shine of these earrings! Very believable size! My only complaint is with the earring backs. They need to be made more substantial and tighter. The backs repeatedly fell off the earrings easily. But since I love the earrings, I just put different backs on them. I am a happy camper!
Date published: 2014-02-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great buy I'm very happy with these earrings! They are sparkly and a great size to wear every day. I sleep and exercise with them in and they are so comfortable I don't feel like I'm wearing anything in my ears. Highly recommended!
Date published: 2013-12-21
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love these stud earrings! I bought these earrings because I wanted a pair of studs to wear in my second holes in my ears. I had bought other studs but they were too big and didn't hang right, as I have very thin earlobes. These are just right! In addition to being absolutely beautiful, they are a very believable size to wear for every day. This is a cut that was not familiar to me, but it is an amazing way to show off the stone. It is a much deeper cut, which makes for a sparklier stone. The diamonique is exquisite, as always. I would recommend these for anyone who wants a subtle, yet striking-looking earring.
Date published: 2013-07-09
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Very happy So realistic and so sparkly. The size makes them very believable and I know I will be wearing these quite often--both for formal and casual affairs. I highly recommend these if you are looking for elegance. And bonus: you sure won't feel guilty for spending too much on diamonds nor horrified if you were to lose them!
Date published: 2013-05-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great studs If anyone knows what a true Asscher is, they'll know that it is a deep cut, and therefore looks smaller than a princess or round brilliant of the same cttw. The long flashes of fire given off by these are very brilliant. Real Asscher studs can run you the price of a compact car. The only negative is the lightweight of the gold... The backs were like tin, but the stones are ten star fakes!
Date published: 2013-05-02
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not as presented I wanted to love these earrings but unfortunately they were not as presented on the website. The stones were VERY small and the settings were quite inferior. (I am wearing a 1.00 ct tw now so I was able to compare the sizes.) I like an earring that is substantial with a tight back fastener. These earrings did not have either attribute, I can say that the stones were gorgeous it's just too bad that they weren't in a better setting.
Date published: 2012-01-20
  • y_2019, m_3, d_22, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.11
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_19
  • loc_, sid_J105317, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc