J352055

Diamond Garland Band Ring, 1.00 cttw, 14K, by Affinity

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail
$1,599.00
$949.96

or 6 Easy Pays of $158.33

+ S&H and tax

Color:  
Size:  

12 Months Qcard Special Financing ™

Offer Ends06/30 Details
Description
Maximize your moments to shine with this stunning and special 98-facet Affinity diamond band ring. The 14K gold ring boasts a full carat of brilliant, high-quality diamonds that have been cut to radiate even more light and sparkle--whether you wear it as a wedding ring, an anniversary band, or a stand-alone stunner. From Affinity(R) Diamond Jewelry.

  • 14K gold
  • Total diamond weight is approximately 1.00 carat; diamond weights are minimum weights
  • Diamond color: H
  • Diamond clarity: SI2
  • Sixteen round, prong-set, 98-facet diamonds in various sizes across top of band; polished, tapered shank
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
  • Measures approximately 1/8"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

See a list of products from Affinity(R) Diamond Jewelry show that aired

Tuesday, March 19, 2019 from 3 – 4 a.m. ET

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamond Garland Band Ring, 1.00 cttw, 14K, by Affinity is rated 4.5 out of 5 by 97.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Prongs between fingers uncomfortable Sadly I returned the white gold Affinity garland ring. The diamonds set in prongs were too far down on each side thus I found the feeling of the prongs very uncomfortable between my fingers. Had diamonds with prongs stopped a little farther up, it would have worked...or a channel setting...
Date published: 2019-01-24
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Really really beautiful! The diamonds I got were sparkly, white and clear. Very beautiful, more beautiful than my wedding set! But my hands are old and wrinkly, and it just seemed too beautiful for me to wear. Sad, but I don't want to bring attention to my hands anymore. DO NOT HESITATE TO BUY THIS RING!
Date published: 2019-01-17
Rated 5 out of 5 by from A real sparkler... The extra cuts in the stones make a HUGE difference. One of best purchases from QVC jewelry in 25+ years. At sale price give it a try. It sparkles at work under goofy overhead lights. And outside...a dazzler.
Date published: 2019-01-17
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Nice but not WOW This is a nice ring but it just didn't wow me for the price. I have returned it.
Date published: 2019-01-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Gorgeous! This ring was purchased for my 95 yr old mother. She LOVES it! It sparkles, is just the perfect amount of diamonds and looks beautiful. Very pleased. QVC delivered it immediately and my mom is enjoying it very much.
Date published: 2019-01-08
Rated 5 out of 5 by from well worth the wait I wanted this ring the first time it was presented, it was a little too pricey. I waited a long time, I was looking at the after Christmas sale to find something just for me. With the price reduction I had to have it. Its better in person so much sparkle, love it so glad I waited easy pay helped a lot.
Date published: 2019-01-06
Rated 1 out of 5 by from No sparkle and stones were gray I’m very familiar with the 4c’s and in my opinion the stones in this ring were nowhere near the color and clarity claimed. They were dull and gray. Sent it back and ordered a 100 facet Diamonique ring instead. Haven’t received it yet but I’m confident the sparkle will far surpass this Garland ring.
Date published: 2019-01-05
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not Impressed This is not 98 facets because there’s an average amount of sparkle and fire in these diamonds. I have several diamond bands and these diamonds did not outperform any of those. But what really disappointed me was that the diamonds were not matched, and it was really visible. I am also a consistent size 7 on my ring finger but could barely get this on so there’s a sizing issue as well. It’s going back.
Date published: 2019-01-02
  • y_2019, m_3, d_18, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.11
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_97
  • loc_, sid_J352055, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc