Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
A397598
Barefoot Dreams CozyChic Ultra Lite Lurex Dolman Pullover
Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete
Recommendation Test Anchor, don't delete
Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
$98.00
$35.45
or 5 Easy Pays of $7.09
+ S&H and tax
In Stock
Sold Out
We're sorry.This item is not available at this time.
Pre Order Possible.
Low Stock
Reviews & Community QA
Barefoot Dreams CozyChic Ultra Lite Lurex Dolman Pullover is rated
out of
5 by
4.
Rated 4 out of
5
by
glamlifeKF from
FLATTERING BUT USELESS SIZE CHART
First of all, this is a very Flattering Top. Mind is in Sand Dune & the other darker Solid color in Brown. It has Soft Simmering Effect and It is Soft while I must say, I have a very sensitive skin to begin with. The reason I take down 1 star is Due to Ridiculous Size Chart that run super Gigantic Large that causing painful & stressful experience for Ordering. I have been complaining To CS multiple time like broken record to get QVC to pay attention how to solve this sizing issue that can make your customer to shop elsewhere of you burden it to your customer. So I finally I decide to write the problem we encounter & the solution.
1. I am 5’4” wearing solid size 10 USA size & Busty. In this top I can wear size S and still very roomy with flattering drop in waist section & Chest area little loose ( perfect ). I can layer inside with long sleeves turtleneck & it would not be Snug.
BUT, If you are wearing approx the same size as me, but not busty, I would recommend you to size down even more to size XS because I can wear size XS as well if I want to ( still not snug ), but the drapes will be less flattering on waist size because I am Busty, so I prefer S.
How come from Recommended Size Chart From size L could wear Size S or Even XS, and still NOT SNUG ??!!!
With all the reason above : We Need Pro Host & Also Pro Model to give their size detail in presentation. Professional Hosts I mean is the one who can give describe & guide audience to choose the right size, regardless how useless the size Chart. NEED Professional Models who are not Shy to reveal the size she is wearing in US size. QVC need to remember and also remind the models that They are hired because of their size can help customers to pick the right size for them from home.
We also need at least 3 models to show from smaller size, mid, to Plus size. Do not forget add different height for shorter people. For Ex : Host Jane & Katrina. In front Camera, by width look approx the same. But because of their height.... Jane can wear even size XXS or XS while Katrina more like S/M. In addition some clothing has different cut.. regular to slim cut, this is also can justify diff size.
What we need is a good foundation for us to predict the size we Order. And QVC is really depend on the Pro Hosts & Pro Models to cut back any unnecessary costly Back & Forth S/H that can accumulate to lots of people yearly salaries. Cut back in Warehouse, employee & Fix cost expenses in Return Department. Focus more on The Core of Problem & maintain Quality.
2. Exchange is a good guarantee BUT DO NOT JUST EMPhASIZED on that alone. As a Comp, MUST THINK HOW TO PREVENT THAT FROM HAPPENING to be Cost Efficient & Gives Hassle Free & Happy experience to shop for customers. Mutual benefit for both size as QVC also will save a lot of money. ACCURATE Size Description by HOST is the KEY to prevent any Exchanges. Make sure QVC hosts have Pro Models otherwise just Hired only the Ones that is professional enough & realized that they are hired because of their size. Remember that your customers is from Short to Tall, from Petite, Skinny to Plus Size !!! All of Them has Variety of Body Shape.
3. Describing how tall the Host & the Model & the Size they are wearing is totally USELESS. We need what the actual US size they are wearing. You are selling to varieties of Buyers and many of them do not have QVC Sizing.
Lastly, if you burden S/H to customer due to Poor Size Description, your customers will walk away after sometimes. Unless you are selling only scarf, Bath Robe or Blanket.
Remember that If Customer has to pay costly fees for nothing, & we still have to buy packaging tape and mail the return, We can STOP ORDERING anytime.
The more we return, the more stressful. Not only at QVC sides. Prevent what can be prevented !!!! And Sizing is very Simple thing if only you have Professional Hosts & Models !!!Focus more on the Quality. Not anticipate a costly return that QVC has to Pay because of the most simple thing : SIZING.
Date published: 2021-04-04
Rated 2 out of
5
by
Pacific from
Too large in regular size
I am so disappointed in the fit. I own many many Barefoot Dreams pieces. Love the brand. I usually wear a Med but I ordered a Small because it looked large. For me the small was just too large. I love the style and color in sand but it looked silly being so big. Please continue to make cap sleeves but with less volume around the body.
Date published: 2021-03-15
Rated 3 out of
5
by
valigirl from
NOT THE ULTRALITE WE KNOW & LOVE
Bought the top in floral with the matching joggers thinking it would be the perfect summer lounging set. Cute, different from the conventional BFD style patterns. I sized up on the top, as for lounging/sleeping the more roomier the better, but does fit true to size. Well made. However, major league disappointed as the fabric weight is extremely heavy, more like CozyChic/Cozy Chic Lite. Keeping the joggers, as they can be worn for 3 seasons, on the fence regarding keeping this top. I live in the South and think it will be WAY too warm for the summer months. BFD - Please give this fabric a different name, as it is misleading to your clients! Also, PLEASE offer a true CozyChic Ultralite set. Thanks.
Date published: 2021-03-13
Rated 2 out of
5
by
rpoerio from
Not Ultra Lite
I own many Barefoot Dream pieces including the UL. This is not UL. It’s heavy and just doesn’t look good.. The matching joggers are cute if the weight of the material isn’t a deal breaker. So back it goes.
Date published: 2021-03-13
