Women with Control Petite Brocade Print Slim Leg Pants

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail
Never bore! The brocade print on these Women with Control slim leg pants adds some fun to your wardrobe. Pair them with your favorite flats or boots for style and comfort all year long. From Women with Control(R).

  • Features: pull-on elastic waistband, brocade print
  • Fit: fitted; cut to follow the lines of the body
  • Rise: slightly below the waist
  • Leg Shape: narrow leg; tapers from thigh to leg opening
  • Inseam: petite missy/plus inseam 28"
  • Content: 86% cotton/14% spandex
  • Care: machine wash, tumble dry
  • Imported

To see the specific garment measurements for this item, click here.

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Women with Control Petite Brocade Print Slim Leg Pants is rated 3.9 out of 5 by 18.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Very pleased! These slim leg pants arrived today and are awesome. Nice weight, good fit, not too tight, just right. I bought the olive and stone and are perfect for fall and winter, lots of logo tops to wear with them..
Date published: 2017-10-08
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Brocade Print without the Weight I bought these on a lunch special and I LOVE the print and slim leg cut. I appreciate the brocade print without the heavy weight and texture. This can be a plus or negative to some people depending on what your expectations are. I wanted a lightweight, printed, slim leg pant, so this was perfection. I bought the olive color, and it's a muted color that can work with many other colors. These pants are on the thinner side, but not transparent. Maybe not a winter pant is what I'm saying.
Date published: 2017-10-07
Rated 1 out of 5 by from too baggy Cute print and good length for petites. Good reviews stop there. This pant was too baggy every where! No evidence of butt lifting spandex on this one.
Date published: 2017-10-05
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Best Pants on QVC "Women with Control" !!! These (Women with Control) are the MOST COMFORTABLE, BEST FITTING, & PERFECT 28" INSEAM LENGTH on QVC! The cotton/spandex blend is the VERY BEST!!! I hope to see this brocade print come back in more colors. I would like the blue, an off-white and a rich purple color. I own 4 colors currently. Renee designs such figure flattering styles. Her attention to detail makes this line of pants the "best on QVC". They also work well with other QVC brands, like Isaac M, Logo & Denim & Co. Keep up the great work...Love, love, love your slim leg pants!!! (I am a curvy gal 5'2" 180lbs & wear mostly XL & 1X). The stretch provides the comfort every women deserves in a great pant!!! Thank you for creating this wonderful line of clothing!
Date published: 2017-03-24
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great fit! These pants are one of the few QVC petite pants where the rise fits me correctly (not too short). They are nice and slim but not tight and the fabric is really nice.
Date published: 2017-03-11
Rated 5 out of 5 by from VERY SOFT AND COMFORTABLE! These slim leg pants look adorable in boots and especially with the Cuddle Dud hoodie. I have them in the olive, gray and red and get compliments every time I wear them! So comfortable all day.
Date published: 2017-02-01
Rated 2 out of 5 by from These are leggings, not pants I wanted to like these but they are not pants. These are made from legging material and are cut as pants. I have plenty of leggings. I was looking for nice pants to wear.
Date published: 2017-01-17
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Not what I thought I guess I should have read the reviews more closely. There is no actual brocade here, which I thought was what I was getting. Upon closer reading, "brocade Print." In other words no, 3D or 2D depth to these, no brocade. They were very thin cotton pants, not appropriate for winter with a thin waistband. I have other Pants from WCW but these were, IMHO, very low quality. They are almost like my gym tights, only a different color.Very light weight. Very disappointed in these. Had high hopes but not what I thought. Never worth the $40.
Date published: 2017-01-04
  • y_2018, m_5, d_25, h_20
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_18
  • loc_, sid_A269610, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc