Rated 3.7 out of 5 by 11
Rated 3 out of 5 by RobertaT Sizing not done right
I bought 3 pair of these pants and not one is the same in size. I like the fabric because I can wear them to work, but I don't want to spend money on pants that are not sized right.....how about sizes done right!
Rated 3 out of 5 by proshop2 Skimpy Fit
I ordered these in both black and camel in my regular size. They are too tight in the thigh, the pockets gap open, and there in no give in the waist.
Rated 4 out of 5 by emmlyn No Stretch in Waist
I absolutely love the material in these pants. However, it was a big disappointment there was not any give or stretch in the waist where I could have used some. The pants fit fine everywhere else (size 8 regular), and I'm sure the size 10 would have been baggy in the legs. I'm reluctantly returning these with the hope Susan Graver will remake in the near future with perhaps a bit of elastic in the back waistband. (I would recommend for those gals with a trim waistline.)
Rated 1 out of 5 by Dr Toby Not happy
I am 5'3" and bought the jacket and pants in my regular size 14 ,had to go up to 16 jacket ,returned pants and jacket and ordered 16 pants. The jacket fit snug but ok and the pants ,I couldn't button. Sent them back, now have 18 petite ( all were petite because I am short) and still have gaping pockets, snug waist.what is going on here. I thought she calls herself a fabulous pants designer but come on. Don't know what to do now. Maybe size 16 regular ,oh they have none of those,or 18 regular. I love the style but sizing way off!
Rated 3 out of 5 by rodneysmom Great style , fabric....but too short
Loved these pants- ordered in all 3 colors in my usual SG size (2)- fit was more fitted. Could do without the pockets as they stick out when sitting or even standing if not sewn evenly which I often find to be the case. Only issue- way too short of inseam (30") for my 5'8" height. They hit me like ankle pants and at an awkward length/spot on my lower leg. Regretfully, sending all 3 pants back. Looked to see how much hem was available to potentially let the hem down,,,not enough hem to let down, unfortunately. I'd ask that these be made different lengths, ie,petite, regular and Tall - they are beautiful pants. If redesign is considered, I'd delete the pockets.
Rated 3 out of 5 by Ms NFL Not For Me
I purchased the tan to coordinate with the tan jacket. I am curvy and neither jacket nor pants fit.
For me , these pants ran small. I am 30" waist & 40" hips. I went with sz 8 to follow my waist size. I could barely button the waist. I had camel toe in these pants. The fit on this curvy body was very odd. Back they go. These pants will probably work best on a boyish figure (no hips/derrière).
Rated 5 out of 5 by lsroc SG's Best Pants
I liked Susan's Chelsea stretch pants, but these are 100% better. She is right that these are like the expensive ones you find in the stores. That said, I found the pockets pouched out a little bit and I didn't know if it was me or the pants. They otherwise fit me perfectly. Looking at the models, they kept putting their hands in the pockets, so it was difficult to tell, but they might have been a little pouchy on them too. They are not noticeable with a jacket or other top over them. I will for sure keep the navy, but may not keep the tan. If you made these without this type of pocket, I would buy more. Do more with this fabric!
Rated 4 out of 5 by Babushka Love!
Ordered these to go with the blazer in a size 20 and though the blazer is a perfect fit, I found the pants ran large on me in the hips and legs, so am sizing down. Like the jacket, it is beautifully made. Will make a super classy and expensive looking suit! Four stars for sizing only.