Susan Graver Chelsea Stretch Zip Front Pants w/Side Seam Detail - Petite

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail

Fit right in. These Susan Graver petite Chelsea stretch pants easily slip into your wardrobe for a simple, clean look that pairs perfectly with your favorite blouses, sweaters, and other tops. Enjoy the comfort of the stretch fabric and semi-fitted silhouette, finished off with an on trend narrow leg. From Susan Graver.

  • Fabrication: Chelsea stretch
  • Features: zip front fly, one inside button closure, hook-and-bar closure
  • Rise: at the waist
  • Fit: semi-fitted; follows the lines of the body with added wearing ease
  • Leg Shape: narrow leg; tapers from thigh to leg opening
  • Inseam: petite missy/plus inseam 27"
  • Content: 63% polyester/33% rayon/4% spandex
  • Care: machine wash, tumble dry
  • Imported

To see the specific garment measurements for this item, click here.

Tune in to QVC for Susan Graver Style

Saturday, December 23, 2017 from 6 – 8 p.m. ET

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Susan Graver Chelsea Stretch Zip Front Pants w/Side Seam Detail - Petite is rated 3.4 out of 5 by 11.
Rated 2 out of 5 by from great price but so for this price, I had to try. Good thing I wasn't in desperate need, cause they are on there way back. First on opening - they smelled and were very wrinkled. I took them out and held them out and repacked - these must be from a series from a few years ago. I didn't even try them on to be honest, because the shape said, too long in the crutch and not my style anymore. Like i said above they smelled so I wasn't anxious to try on. So for the send back price, I will only be getting $14. but why keep if you are not going to be happy. Pants need to fit right.
Date published: 2017-11-16
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Amazing A true petite pant, usually I have to hem petite length pants, not these one, they fit right as soon as I put them on. Comfortable and have a nice feel to them.
Date published: 2017-04-18
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Runs Small These slacks were made well but the size is not true to size. They fit more like a size 18 instead of a 20, very disappointed.
Date published: 2016-10-03
Rated 5 out of 5 by from The Perfect Pant This are the perfect pant for my 5'3" frame. They fit perfectly in the petite--no need to take up the hem, as is the case many times when I purchase petites in other brands. The rise is perfect for me, too--not too long. I love the side seam--it just gives the item a little more distinction. I will buy these again.
Date published: 2015-09-25
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Sizing off? I was so anxious to get these Chelsea pants and when I received them and tried them on I was so disappointed. I normally wear a size 6 average, but the size 10 on the sizing chart is what I was supposed to order, which I did. They were very baggy. I am 5' 3" and 132 lbs. and I feel like these were made for a very hippy or fuller figured woman. :(
Date published: 2015-07-21
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Nice Slacks These are really nice slacks, nice fabric and good fit, but I found the side seam detail unflattering. Will order more of Susan's slacks but watch the details more closely
Date published: 2015-07-10
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Disappointing The size was true, but that's probably the only good thing I can say. The material was very thin and felt like bad polyester to me. I returned them.
Date published: 2015-07-03
Rated 2 out of 5 by from So Disappointed I am a huge fan of Susan Graver products but these pants were a huge disappointment. I always wear a medium in SG items and never had a size problem. I ordered the Petite Medium and was so excited until I tried them on. Fabric was really nice but the fit was way too small. No problem - sent them back and order a size up and they just arrived and the fit is exactly the same - way to tight. So-o-o back they go and will not try again. I have read many of the reviews both of Susan Graver and Denim & co and many state that the sizing cannot be relied on. It seems quality control needs to check the items much more carefully. Really sad
Date published: 2015-02-04
  • y_2017, m_12, d_13, h_20
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_11
  • loc_, sid_A259587, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc