Sterling 2.00 cttw Morganite & Diamond Earrings14K Plated

Sterling 2.00 cttw Morganite & Diamond Earrings14K Plated
product thumbnail

Prettiest pink. These sweet, 14K rose gold-plated sterling silver earrings let a fashionista honor her feminine side. A dazzling, cushion-cut morganite gemstone dangles from a lever back that displays a brilliant row of pave-set diamonds.

  • 14K rose gold-plated sterling silver
  • Total morganite weight is approximately 2.00 carats
  • Total diamond weight is approximately 1/10 carat; diamond weights are minimum weights
  • Prong-set, cushion-cut morganite gemstone dangle; hinged lever back with pave-set diamonds
  • Lever backs, for pierced ears only
  • Measures approximately 7/8"L x 1/4"W
  • Made in China

Important Details

The GIA (Gemological Institute of America) is widely recognized as the world's foremost authority in gemology, including diamonds, colored stones, and pearls. Through research, education, and laboratory services, the GIA serves the public interest through objective gemstone evaluation, including identification.

You can purchase our gemstone jewelry with added confidence knowing that QVC incorporates the GIA's expertise into the QVC gemstone identification quality assurance process.

For more information on the GIA, visit www.GIA.edu.

For more information on the gemstones found at QVC, check out our gemstone glossary.

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Sterling 2.00 cttw Morganite & Diamond Earrings14K Plated is rated 3.0 out of 5 by 3.
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Pretty Beautiful earrings but smaller than I expected. Not worth returning.
Date published: 2014-11-15
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Very Nice Diamonds are a nice accent and add to the sparkle, and the morganite shines through.
Date published: 2014-07-06
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Fair Was excited to receive my first morganite piece of jewelry. The earrings are just fair, even though the diamond weight is minimal, the quality is so poor that it takes away from the impact of the earring. Would have been better off with no diamonds.
Date published: 2013-01-10
  • y_2017, m_8, d_21, h_21
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_1.0.0-hotfix-1
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_3
  • loc_, sid_J311544, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc