K45542

Rachael Ray 6-piece Melamine Measuring Cups

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail
$22.00

or 4 Easy Pays of $4.11

+ S&H and tax

Option:  
Description
Measuring and prepping is simple--and stylish--with this set of six melamine measuring cups, which nest for easy storage. From Rachael Ray.

  • Includes 3-cup, 2-cup, 1-cup, 1/2-cup, 1/3-cup, and 1/4-cup melamine measuring cups
  • Cup capacity marked on inside rim
  • Cups stack inside each other
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Rachael Ray 6-piece Melamine Measuring Cups is rated 3.3 out of 5 by 12.
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Too small These looked so much bigger in the presentation. I bought these for my niece for a wedding shower gift, but not sure she would like these as you can hardly see the measurements in the inside and they are awkward to hold. If your fingers become slippery when trying to use these, that is an accident waiting to happen. I also did not like the fact that they are not microwave safe. The large one would be useful for melting butter. I like the color, not the ineffective usability of the set.
Date published: 2018-02-16
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Well.... These are definitely cute and the color is lively ( orange), and very easy to wash. It kind of ends there for me. I find these are quite slick and difficult to hold on to. Like several other reviews, I am disappointed with the size marking. The raised sizing on the inside is too difficult to read as it is the same color as the bowls. The largest and smallest sizes are easy enough to determine, but the sizes in the middle are anyones guess. Since these are Measuring Cups, we should be able to accurately measure, right? Yes, I can mark the sizes for myself with a sharpie, but that should have been factored into the design. Really expected to love these as much as other RR products, but not the case this time. Too much trouble/expense to return so will keep and figure out ways to use them.
Date published: 2018-02-16
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Use a felt marker on bottom Everyone , this is what I did , use a felt marker on the bottom of the bowls .... It is strange , that they don't have them Mark to read on the bottom , lol How hard could that have been, no you cannot read the measurements, so spend extra .79 for felt pen and mark them yourself ..........
Date published: 2018-02-10
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Hard to read measurements It’s hard to read the measurement as it’s the same color as the bowl, and inside. Also, if you go to the trouble to include a 3 cup, why not include a 3/4 cup? I have several receipts that call for 3/4 cup and have yet to find a newer set of measuring cups that include a 3/4 cup. These are just okay, nothing great about them at all. Plus shipping for this size product should be $3.00!
Date published: 2018-02-08
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Great for Mise En Place The measurements are hard to read but I purchased these for myself and as a couple of add-on gifts for Mise en place. In the past I used whatever I had on hand to have my ingredients pre-measured and ready to roll when baking but having this set has been a good replacement. I also love that they are stackable and light weight.
Date published: 2018-01-28
Rated 2 out of 5 by from hard to read nice color blue I love these but very hard to read measurement needs to be fixed to be able read color is odd blue but I like that
Date published: 2018-01-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Super convenient I ordered a set of these from "as is" and I used them to make my Christmas cookies yesterday. They are super convenient and the 2 & 3 cup sizes are great for measuring flour & sugar. They won't break and they clean up very easily. Love them.
Date published: 2017-12-20
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Need To Return It. I'm not happy with the measuring cups. Could not find the measuring amount for a time. Finally felt the inside and could not read it. It should of been in a dark color to read the measuring amount . I also think there should of been a handle to hold each one. First time I disapprove something from Rachael Ray.
Date published: 2017-12-08
  • y_2018, m_2, d_19, h_20
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.7
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_12
  • loc_, sid_K45542, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc