J348439

Oval Gemstone Sterling Silver Pave' Ring 2.20 cttw

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail
$107.00

or 4 Easy Pays of $12.49

+ S&H and tax Good until June 22, 2018 2:59 a.m. ET

Color:  
Size:  
Description
Whether you choose by birthstone or your favorite color, this semi-precious gemstone ring turns any day into a special occasion! The center gemstone's vibrant color is amplified by the surrounding pave-set stones that continue down the sides to instantly brighten up your weekday and weekend wardrobes.

  • Sterling silver
  • Total gemstone weights are approximate: Blue Topaz 3.00 carats; Garnet 3.00 carats; Peridot 2.60 carats; Amethyst 2.20 carats; Citrine 2.20 carats
  • Semi-precious, oval gemstone prong set in center surrounded by round, pave-set, semi-precious gemstones that continue down the shank; black rhodium plating on round gemstone settings; polished
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
  • Measures approximately 1/2"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Oval Gemstone Sterling Silver Pave' Ring 2.20 cttw is rated 4.3 out of 5 by 238.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Such a pretty ring I love this ring. I have it in two colors, and I think it’s very comfortable and a great every day piece and yet a statement piece at the same time. And the vintage look is so pretty. Please keep bringing rings and other things like these.
Date published: 2018-05-26
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Beautiful, but they lose stones I bought these for myself in garnet and citrine and a few more to save for Christmas gifts. After wearing mine a few times, the citrine lost a stone so I sent for an exchange. In the meantime, I wore the garnet and promptly lost a stone. I have yet to receive the citrine back but when I do, I'll be returning it along with the gifts. The quality is questionable.
Date published: 2018-05-19
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Average Look I got the purple stone. It looks black around the stone where the shank stones are - I guess it's supposed to look antique with the black coloring - mine just looks dirty. The stone color is fine, but it's not a very aesthetically pleasing ring,...frankly, it looked much prettier under the lights of the TV presentation. It's going into my "I don't care if it's stolen" travel jewelry collection and I chose not to return it as it wasn't very expensive. They need to leave the shank the lighter silver around the stones - would make a much prettier ring.
Date published: 2018-05-14
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love this ring I was so happy with my purchase of this ring! I love that the ring had this antique look to it! Loved it so much I purchased a 2nd ring in Citrine!
Date published: 2018-04-23
Rated 5 out of 5 by from great red color Purchased the garnet for a just because gift for my daughter the stones sparkle and the color is great I think she's going to love it.
Date published: 2018-04-19
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Disappointed Ring does not look like picture on TV. Disappointed in it and as it had a cloudy look to it that made it look really cheap. Not pretty to wear.
Date published: 2018-04-16
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Citrine stone beautiful, but.. The stone was beautiful, but couldn't get past the smaller stones and/or design background on either side looking somehow "dirty". I decided to return the ring.
Date published: 2018-04-16
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Gorgeous! Oh, I just love this ring. I am not a fan of garnet but I realized that I liked garnet set within an oxidized setting or the dark rhodium setting. My favorite color is red. What have I been missing all these years? I am thrilled with this ring and to get it at a discounted price ? What could be better? On the fence? Just order it.
Date published: 2018-04-16
  • y_2018, m_6, d_19, h_18
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_238
  • loc_, sid_J348439, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc