A278476

Kelly by Clinton Kelly V-Neck Pleated Front Sleeveless Top

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail
$48.00

Color:  
Size:  
Description
Pleats to meet you. This polished Kelly by Clinton Kelly woven top pairs a pleated front with a sleeveless silhouette and stand collar--for a style you can sport alone or wear with a jacket. From Kelly by Clinton Kelly.

  • Fabrication: woven
  • Features: V-neckline with standing collar, pleated front, sleeveless
  • Fit: semi-fitted; follows the lines of the body with added wearing ease
  • Length: missy length 26" to 28-1/8"; plus length 28-1/2" to 30-1/4"
  • Content: 92% polyester/8% spandex
  • Care: machine wash, dry flat
  • Imported

To see the specific garment measurements for this item, click here.

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Kelly by Clinton Kelly V-Neck Pleated Front Sleeveless Top is rated 3.7 out of 5 by 24.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from agree w/ other reviewers. armholes TOO SMALL. The armholes are too small as preview reviewers stated. The V-neck is too tight. it comes up to the lower part of my neck almost choking me! and the stomach area has enough room for a 9 month pregnant woman. and believe me, I have a tummy and there was still room for a pregnant woman to carry a full term baby! LOL. I am 5 ft. 3. I weigh 220 lbs. I wear a size 16-18. I wear a size XL normally in items such as this that do not stretch because I am in between sizes. This is the most awkward fitting top I have ever tried on in my life! Do not waste your money.
Date published: 2017-08-23
Rated 3 out of 5 by from White blouse The material is very nice and silky; wash and dries nicely. Only thing I do not like is that I look pregnant if I do not wear it tucked in.
Date published: 2017-06-16
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Reviews are mostly true-huge armhole alert OK, the reviews prior to my purchase were mixed. Armholes too big, armholes too small, etc. I have another CK blouse that I love so I took a chance. Not only were the armholes huge in this shirt, the sides beneath the armhole needed to be taken in. I do like the style of this and flirted with the idea of having it altered but then it would likely have cost me double. I feel there should be NO return shipping fee for items that are "defective" as this one clearly was for me. This makes me question the "Q" that used to mean quality. Yes, returns are somewhat convenient but I'm paying more than twice to return ship than I paid to get it.
Date published: 2017-05-19
Rated 2 out of 5 by from NOT AS EXPECTED I gave it 2 stars because I thought the design idea was good … it all stopped there. The arm holes are very small and come up into the arm pit, where the fabric buckles out. The fabric is similar to the polyester from the 80's .. This is a must-miss. Going back toQVC.
Date published: 2017-04-19
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Soft and feminine I live this top! Very flattering for plus size! Colors are wonderful on this print
Date published: 2017-04-17
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Pretty But Large Armholes I like this top. It will be cool & lightweight for the summer and cute with a cardigan or duster. Unfortunately, the armholes are a bit large and I'm trying to figure out how to remedy this. I don't want to return and pay shipping.
Date published: 2017-04-02
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Lovely Problem This is a lovely blouse in White. My only problem is with the arm holes. They are a bit too small for me. I am not sure if I will return for the next size up, as the blouse fits perfectly everywhere else. Afraid it may be too big! What a dilemma!
Date published: 2017-03-24
Rated 3 out of 5 by from I wanted to love these I ordered both the print and the solid in this blouse and had to return them. The fit was very nice everywhere except for the arm holes. They were too large. The overall style and the fabrics were very nice. I considered keeping them and wearing them under jackets, but decided to return them rather than be restricted as to how I could wear them. I love the line, but this particular item just didn't work for me.
Date published: 2016-10-05
  • y_2017, m_11, d_16, h_21
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_24
  • loc_, sid_A278476, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc