J331607

Judith Ripka Sterling Silver Diamonique Tassel Necklace

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail
$219.00

or 6 Easy Pays of $20.80

+ S&H and tax

Description
When you just want something "more" to show the world, this Judith Ripka necklace is the perfect remedy. Cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond tassels cascade from a mother-of-pearl station to create a dazzling look. From Judith Ripka.

  • Sterling silver
  • Gemstone weight is not given for mother-of-pearl
  • Total approximate Diamonique simulated diamond weight is 2.80 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Tassel station; two Diamonique simulated diamond stations; hexagon-shaped, faceted crystal quartz with white mother-of-pearl doublet station; dangling tassels with round- and diamond-shaped Diamonique simulated diamonds; round link chain
  • Heart-shaped lobster claw clasp with Diamonique simulated diamonds and berge texture
  • Approximate measurements: Tassel 2-7/8"L x 3/8"W; Chain 18"L x 1/8"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Judith Ripka Sterling Silver Diamonique Tassel Necklace is rated 3.0 out of 5 by 3.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Timeless Beauty Not sure why the negative reviews. I have many Judith Ripka pieces and this one fits right in. It has a very estate presence. Please ladies if you are a Ripka girl don't hesitate. Thank you Judith , QVC shopper for 23 yrs!
Date published: 2017-02-15
Rated 2 out of 5 by from What a disappointment I am obsessed with Judith Ripka and was so excited when I saw this bracelet presented! When I opened the box I immediately was disappointed. I agree with what the previous reviewer said: it feels cheep and that corners were cut to keep cost down. I love this look and would have paid more for this look if well executed. Honestly I expect way more from Judith Ripka. I am returning this necklace.
Date published: 2016-09-07
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Not impressed The necklace was disappointing; seemed very skimpy in person. No sparkle; am sending back, not worth the money.
Date published: 2016-09-03
  • y_2017, m_4, d_12, h_14
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_1.0.0-hotfix-1
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_3
  • loc_, sid_J331607, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc