Judith Ripka Sterling Silver 8.00 cttw Multi Gemstone Necklace

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail

or 6 Easy Pays of $26.04

+ S&H and tax

The colorful bouquet of oval gemstones makes this necklace a stunner; the cubic zirconia Diamonique simulated diamonds make it dazzle even more. From Judith Ripka.

  • Sterling silver
  • Total gemstone weight is approximately 8.00 carats
  • Total Diamonique(R) simulated diamond weight is approximately 1.30 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Prong-set, oval gemstones with partial bezel-set baguette Diamonique simulated diamond below; gemstones include Swiss blue topaz, citrine, amethyst, rhodolite, and peridot; gemstones connected by textured oval link chain with baguette Diamonique simulated diamond stations; berge motifs
  • Heart-shaped lobster claw clasp
  • Approximate measurements: Necklace 18"L to 20"L x 1/4"W; Gemstone stations 1/4"L x 4-1/2"W
  • Imported

Tune in to QVC for Judith Ripka Jewelry

Wednesday, January 24, 2018 from 2 – 3 p.m. ET

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Judith Ripka Sterling Silver 8.00 cttw Multi Gemstone Necklace is rated 1.5 out of 5 by 2.
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Small and flimsy The stones themselves were pretty but they flip over and all you see is the silver top, not the gemstone. I love multigemstone jewlrey. This was too fine and delicate for the price.judith Ripken pieces have been disappointing.
Date published: 2017-06-27
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Oh No!!!!! I'm a gemstone lover. I love all the beautiful colors and wanted to have this necklace so much , in spite of the price. BAs soon as I opened the package , I knew there was a problem. The stones are beautiful but the chain is way too thin for the weight of the stones. I put the necklace on and every stone turned over. And the stones are not finished on the underside . I love Judith Ripka jewelry , but how was this necklace supposed to sit properly on the neck with the stones facing forward on such a very thin chain ?? Sorry but this has to go back.
Date published: 2017-05-24
  • y_2018, m_1, d_11, h_10
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_2
  • loc_, sid_J347942, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc