J348260

Judith Ripka Sterling Silver 16.50 cttw Blue Topaz Monaco Ring

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail
$714.00

or 6 Easy Pays of $81.00

+ S&H and tax

Option:  

9 Months Qcard Special Financing ™

Offer Ends03/31 Details
Description
A brilliant bonanza of blue, this sterling silver ring showcases a pineapple, cushion-cut sky blue topaz at the center, flanked by London blue topaz on the sides. From Judith Ripka.

  • Sterling silver
  • Total blue topaz weight is approximately 16.50 carats
  • Total Diamonique(R) simulated diamond weight is approximately 1/4 carat; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Pineapple, cushion-cut prong-set sky blue topaz in center; bezel-set Diamonique simulated diamonds in rope-motif prongs; round, pave-set London blue topaz in black rhodium on sides; rope and berge motifs
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
  • Measures approximately 5/8"L x 7/8"W
  • Imported

Tune in to QVC for Judith Ripka Jewelry

Friday, December 22, 2017 from Midnight – 2 a.m., 3 – 4 a.m., 11a.m. – 1 p.m., 6 – 8 p.m. ET

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Judith Ripka Sterling Silver 16.50 cttw Blue Topaz Monaco Ring is rated 2.4 out of 5 by 5.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Disappointed What a beautiful ring online and in the presentation. I couldn't wait to receive it. I opened it and put it on my finger and I could see the skin tone right thru the stone, as the stone was so pale. I was floored that this is what I got for such an expensive amount and of course from Judith Ripka. I'm so sad. I sent it back. I even tried it on out in the sunlight, inside in living room light and bright home lighting. Nothing improved the look of this center stone. The setting was beautiful and I loved that part of it but the center stone was a big 0.
Date published: 2017-11-20
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Baby Monaco Very disappointing! I just received this today and this ring is so much smaller than the other Monaco’s I own. The center stone is almost clear, the side stones are a nice color but the ring is not substantial like Judith’s other Monaco rings. I totally agree with the other reviewers. What a disappointment I expected it to be the same size as the other three Monaco’s I own. Please bring back the old Monaco setting that was a WINNER!
Date published: 2017-11-05
Rated 2 out of 5 by from So Disappointing When this ring first appeared on air, I was mesmerized. Unfortunately, the price was too steep for me so I was thrilled when it went on sale. How disappointed I was when I received this ring. I own a number of light blue topaz rings, but this one might as well be a clear crystal. The center stone is colorless and you can see my skin clearly under the stone. It is also much smaller than I anticipated, although I cannot fault Judith for this since the dimensions were listed in the description of this ring. The topaz stones along the shank are nice, but this ring is totally not worth the money. Particularly, the original price, but not even the sale price. It is going back for sure.
Date published: 2017-11-03
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Nothing like the older Monaco rings This ring was a total disappointment. I own Judith’s original Monaco rings in 5 different stone combinations. This new Monaco has none of the wow factor and presence of the originals. The center stone is basically colorless,although the side stones are lovely. The shank is thin and does not support the stone,so the ring spins. The quality is definitely lacking in the silver presence as well. Returning asap. Sorry Judith...I own ,ots of your jewelry but this ring misses the mark.
Date published: 2017-11-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful Ring This is a beautiful ring. It is larger than I usually wear but not too large. The stones are a good color and the ring fits well. I recommend it.
Date published: 2017-10-24
  • y_2017, m_12, d_16, h_19
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_5
  • loc_, sid_J348260, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc