Judith Ripka Sterling Pink Diamonique Ring 16.05 cttw

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.
product thumbnail
Make a splash every time you slip on this stunning Judith Ripka ring. A pink cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond is the brilliant centerpiece, complemented perfectly by more pink cubic zirconia Diamonique simulated diamonds. From Judith Ripka.

  • Sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 16.05 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Prong-set, rectangular cushion-cut, pink Diamonique simulated diamond and prong setting with pink Diamonique simulated diamonds in black rhodium plating; pave-set, round, pink Diamonique simulated diamonds surrounding center setting and on portion of split shank in black rhodium plating, with berge texture on remaining crossover design; berge and rope motifs
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
  • Measures approximately 1"L x 7/8"W
  • Imported

Tune in to QVC for Judith Ripka Jewelry

Tuesday, May 29, 2018 from 5 – 6 p.m. ET and Thursday, May 31, 2018 from 1 – 2 a.m., 1 – 3 p.m., 7 – 8 p.m. ET

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Judith Ripka Sterling Pink Diamonique Ring 16.05 cttw is rated 3.8 out of 5 by 8.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from outstanding got ring today. Ready for Vegas on Monday. Beautiful ring
Date published: 2017-03-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful Received this as a Valentines day gift from my husband and I love it! If you like big and beautiful, you will love this ring. Very comfortable!
Date published: 2017-01-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from ABSOLUTE STUNNER ! I love pink and I love this ring. The center stone is a wow! If you don't like a large ring , don't buy this one.
Date published: 2017-01-13
Rated 1 out of 5 by from To big This ring was way big. Love the color. I mean way big
Date published: 2017-01-13
Rated 5 out of 5 by from incredible This ring is impeccable. This ring is truly a statement of beauty with the perfect large pink rectangular cushion-cut Diamonique. The rhodium plating to enhance the pave stones that surrounds the ring is the pièce de résistance , along with the pave prongs. I love the presence of this ring on the finger. I am very particular about my jewelry, this ring speaks to my soul. Thank You Judith!
Date published: 2016-12-01
Rated 5 out of 5 by from A PINK KNOCKOUT! Holy WOW, this is a stunner! It’s bigger in person than I expected and that is great! As soon as I saw this ring design, I knew I had to have one of them, if not both. Of course I didn’t want to pay more for the pink, but I really wanted the pink with pink, so I plunged in; and for what it is, with all those pave stones and the generous overall size, the price was right, which makes the price of the yellow and white version a steal! I’ll likely get that ASAP too. If only it was still on 6 easy pay! The center stone appears somewhat paler in different lighting I’ve seen it in so far, with the many surrounding stones seeming a darker bolder pink. It’s truly a beautiful big bold ring, I don’t know why anyone who loves larger rings wouldn’t love it! The presentation was lovely and joyful, I always enjoy watching Judith R and Antonella N together, selling these gorgeous rings on such pretty hands!
Date published: 2016-11-18
Rated 2 out of 5 by from No wow factor I too was underwhelmed with this ring. Had high hopes but just did not deliver a Wow factor. Also the prongs are rough on the inside of fingers. I did not understand the $100 extra for pink.
Date published: 2016-09-07
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Eh This ring in the pink did not knock my socks off as I thought it would. It was lackluster. It was overpriced. It was top heavy and the size 6 fit like a 7 if you ask me. I'm not paying extra to have it sized either. I gave it two stars because I like pink in general and it had potential. The only way I could get a little sparkle was in direct light. I was really disappointed. I don't like the black background at all. It makes the pieces look dirty, like it needs a good scrubbing. Not good. It looked much different on TV, that's why I ordered. Well, back it goes.
Date published: 2016-09-01
  • y_2017, m_4, d_13, h_21
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_1.0.0-hotfix-1
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_8
  • loc_, sid_J331753, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc