J331040

Judith Ripka Sterling 3.65 cttw Diamonique Ring

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail
Description
The center stone isn't the only part of this bypass Judith Ripka ring that dazzles. Along with the bezel-set, oval, cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond at one end are tapered square and baguette Diamonique simulated diamonds in a channel setting along the band. From Judith Ripka.

  • Sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 3.65 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Bezel-set, oval Diamonique simulated diamond with berge motif at one end; channel-set square and baguette Diamonique simulated diamonds with berge motif taper down one side and continue up the other
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
  • Measures approximately 1/2"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

Tune in to QVC for Judith Ripka Jewelry

Sunday, July 30, 2017 from 4 – 6 a.m. ET and Wednesday, August 2, 2017 from 5 – 7 a.m., 10 a.m. – Noon ET

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Judith Ripka Sterling 3.65 cttw Diamonique Ring is rated 4.2 out of 5 by 6.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from What's Up QVC !!!!!!!! I have ordered this ring twice in a size 6 and BOTH TIMES there was a stone MISSING !!! What is happening to your QUALITY CONTROL !!!!!!!! The past year and a half it seems to be missing !!I I have had to send back many items due to damage or off sizing !!!!!
Date published: 2017-05-30
Rated 5 out of 5 by from BEAUTIFUL Received this the other day and I have to say it is one of the prettiest rings that Judith has brought to QVC. I have many Judith Ripka pieces and this one is just as stunning. It is as beautiful on the hand as off. The wrap around design is very flattering and the combination of the stones make it even more special. If you are questioning whether you should or not---- don't hesitate. You won't be disappointed
Date published: 2017-04-17
Rated 5 out of 5 by from A real sparkler... Beautiful ring, so happy to have got my size and at the clearance price...quite the dazzler! If your size is available order before its gone.
Date published: 2017-02-23
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Very sparkly stones This is a really pretty ring, with lots of shine and sparkle. Unfortunately, due to the configuration, which is unique, and the reason I ordered, it does not sit right on my finger. The oval stone seems to sit up a bit more than the other side. I could see it hooking on lighter, more loosely woven fabrics. The Diamonique is the best I've seen for brilliance! Wish I didn't have to return it!
Date published: 2016-10-14
Rated 5 out of 5 by from REAL DAZZLER I just received this ring and it is stunning. I asked for this for my 40th anniversary this month. My own 40 year old diamond is three carats but fell out of the setting a few months ago and luckily my husband found it in our car. I did not want it reset in the setting it fell out of since my confidence level that it would not happen was gone. Looked at various settings and was not impressed since they all look the same. I wanted something very contemporary and unique. Thank you Judith this is just perfect for my taste and personality. I bought it in the silver since that was what my engagement ring was set in white gold. I just keep admiring my hand and so delighted that I took a chance. Really sparkles and looks real.
Date published: 2016-10-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from AWESOME!!!!! I just love this ring. I looks so nice on the finger and it sparkles likes crazy. Usually oval stones do not have that much sparkle in them but this one is different. Both the oval and the princess stones in this ring have so much glitter in them. You will not be disappointed if you purchase it.
Date published: 2016-09-28
  • y_2017, m_7, d_21, h_21
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_1.0.0-hotfix-1
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_6
  • loc_, sid_J331040, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc