J294483

Judith Ripka 2.50 cttw Pave Diamonique Braided Station Bracelet

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail
$154.00

or 6 Easy Pays of $16.00

+ S&H and tax

Please select an option:

Option: 
Description
Add a touch of brilliance to your ensemble with this Judith Ripka bracelet. Crafted with a center station of pave-set cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamonds and sterling silver rope design borders, it infuses your look with a flash of shimmer. From Judith Ripka.

Small, Average, or Large.

For more details on this bracelet's fit, please refer to Wrist Assist--the Bracelet Fit Guide above.

  • Sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 2.50 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Black braided imitation leather bracelet with a station of pave-set Diamonique simulated diamonds; rope-design borders
  • Magnetic closure incorporates pave setting
  • Due to the design elements of this bracelet, the fit and length measurements may differ; please order according to fit
  • Small: 6-3/4" Fit; measures approximately 3/8"W
  • Average: 7-1/2" Fit; measures approximately 3/8"W
  • Large: 8-1/4" Fit; measures approximately 3/8"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Judith Ripka 2.50 cttw Pave Diamonique Braided Station Bracelet is rated 2.8 out of 5 by 22.
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Disappointed I do not feel this is a good value for me. The magnetic closure was very hard to open initially and when I close the bracelet the closure does not lay flush, there is a small separation so it doesn't look finished/. I think it's to much money for what you're getting in this bracelet. Very disappointing.
Date published: 2016-04-11
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Disappointed Beautiful bracelet but the clasp is always coming apart. It's only a matter of time before I lose it.
Date published: 2016-03-23
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Disappointed Didn't love it! I felt for the money I could go to "any" store and pick something up similar and a lot cheaper.
Date published: 2015-05-07
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Magnet Problems I returned the first bracelet because the magnet was no longer magnetized after a few uses. Returned it and, lo and behold, the second bracelet had the same problem. Had to return it also. The bracelet is beautiful but the two I received were defective.
Date published: 2014-11-26
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful bracelet I love this bracelet. It's a cross between casual and elegance. I love the way it clasps. Very easy to put on and take off. The diamond part does tend to hang on the bottom of your arm so I pushed it up my arm a little way to keep the diamonds on the top of my arm. The quality is very good. I would order one in vermeil if they offer it. Well worth the price.
Date published: 2014-07-27
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Went Back Doesn't sit right on the wrist and was too pricey for what you got. Sorry, mine went back.
Date published: 2014-07-12
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Bad Clasp I have worn this twice. The magnet came apart multiple times. I was afraid I would lose it. Unfortunately the clasp doesn't meet to continue the sparkle and the magnet doesn't hold. I have a small wrist so there's plenty of room, it's not as if it were bursting off my wrist. Has to go back!!!!!!
Date published: 2014-07-08
Rated 1 out of 5 by from No way I was very disappointed in this bracelet. There was a definite separation between the diamonique and where the magnet met that just ruined the look for me. This was also much smaller in scale than I thought it would be. Not a large showy piece. This was way overpriced for what was there. I could hardly wait to get this piece to wear throughout the summer with a bold bling station look, boy, was I wrong. Back this had to go. If you ever make a really substantial piece and not charge an unreasonable amount for mostly leather with minimal silver content and some synthetic diamonds, and fix the gap in the magnet issue, then I would purchase 2 of them to stack!! I was sad that it was not what I thought it to be.
Date published: 2014-05-28
  • y_2017, m_6, d_22, h_21
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_1.0.0-hotfix-1
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_22
  • loc_, sid_J294483, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc

Let's Stay in Touch

* *You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Connect with Us

The scoop on everything Q, from helpful tips to interesting tidbits, questions, answers, and more.

QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites, nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.

© 1995–2017 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. Trademark Notice

Desktop View Mobile View