G.I.L.I. Lace-up Camo Sneakers - Janna

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail

or 4 Easy Pays of $9.74

+ S&H and tax

These camouflage sneakers won't hide your sense of style. Perfect for kicking around town or kicking through leaves, they'll take you where you want to go in comfort. From G.I.L.I. got it love it(R).

  • Style: Janna
  • Suede upper with camo detailing, lace-up closure
  • Removable padded insole, textured outsole
  • Approximately 1"H sole
  • Fit: true to size
  • Man-made materials
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

G.I.L.I. Lace-up Camo Sneakers - Janna is rated 2.1 out of 5 by 10.
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Cute I actually really like this shoe. It is a bit stiff at first but did loosen up. Get tons of compliments, comfortable for all day wear
Date published: 2017-11-09
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Really cute But stiff and uncomfortable! I have to agree with a lot of reviews that state they are stiff and uncomfortable. However I'm not sure what one reviewer meant that the heel was to high!!!!! There really is no heel height, it's more like a straight small platform sneaker and the heel inside the shoe goes down about 1/8" !!!! To bad because it really is such a cute sneaker I hate to return BUT your feet have to be comfortable....especially in a sneaker!
Date published: 2017-09-16
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Disappointing! I loved these online, thought they would be cute and comfy- unfortunately, they are stiff and uncomfortable on the heel. Great style, but they'll be returned.
Date published: 2017-09-16
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not Comfortable!! I totally agree with "Molly" the review below mine. Stiff and hard and the heal is to high. I wanted to love them so bad because they are so adorable, can't justify the price for them. SO SAD :(((
Date published: 2017-09-16
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Uncomfortable! Thought these would be so comfy and would be a dream to slip on. NOT! Was so looking forward to slipping into a soft comfy cloud. Shoes are stiff, too high on the back of heel, stiff/rough feeling there also, and these Mediums feel like a Narrow width. Going back.
Date published: 2017-09-15
Rated 5 out of 5 by from I really think these are cute! Was worried based on reviews but mine were already on the way. Ordered greystone 9.5. The fit was perfect and they are very attractive looking on the feet. Wasn't sure about the almond shaped toe but it's cute. Plan on wearing them today....I have many pairs of sneakers, some quite a bit more $$ than these. Really happy I wasn't able to cancel.
Date published: 2017-09-15
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Missed by compromises I liked the look of this shoe. When I got it there were no reviews. I was surprised the reviews were so low. And when I put the shoe on I said to myself "huh, this is better than I now expected. After a trial run around the house heres what I foind; The herl is stiff, it may or may not loosen up. The shoes are supportive; maybe too much so. Your feet get hot after a while. There are no pinch points in the shoe and slyho I was afraid it would be too narrow the width is fine. Now for the deal breakers; When I wore them on my kitchen floor they are slippery which could be dangerous (Im 67) there doesn't seem to be a gripnto the sole of the shoe; in fact it is quite hard. It may be flocked?I dunno. The material of the shoe is suspiciously like man made suede (which for the price is rediculous. ) And then the interior tongue was unravelling along the side. Soooo I will be returning them. What a shame.
Date published: 2017-09-15
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Wrong size After seeing the presentation I fell in love with these sneakers unfortunately for me today they arrived at my home n it was the wrong size. Although they were the wrong size I wouldn't put the sneakers on anyway because I value my feet just as much as my life. The shoes are way too hard, the soles of the shoes are plastic maybe styrofoam. I like this brand, she usually has quality items they definitely miss the mark with this one.
Date published: 2017-09-14
  • y_2018, m_3, d_21, h_22
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.7
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_10
  • loc_, sid_A296492, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc