Diamonique 3.00 cttw Solitaire Ring, 14K Yellow Clad

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail

Retail Value: $43.00

or 5 Easy Pays of $5.50

+ S&H and tax Good until November 18, 2017 11:59 p.m. ET

The one. A single cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond beckons from atop this gorgeous Epiphany ring. Crafted of 14K yellow gold-clad sterling silver,the rounded band is a sleek foundation for the stunning sparkler.

Round, Cushion, Princess, Emerald, Asscher, Oval, Marquise, Pear, or Heart.

For more details on this ring's fit, please refer to the Ring Size Guide above.

  • 14K yellow gold-clad sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 3.00 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Raised, prong-set, Diamonique simulated diamond at center; highly polished rounded band
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; due to the special nature of the plating process, QVC does not recommend resizing by a jeweler
  • Measures approximately 1/8"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 3.00 cttw Solitaire Ring, 14K Yellow Clad is rated 4.0 out of 5 by 45.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from WOW! I love this ring. I got the 3 carat yellow clad. It goes perfectly with my 14 ct gold wedding ring. I highly recommend it! I wanted a 14 ct gold ring, but don't have the $$. This one is well worth the $27.50.
Date published: 2017-10-17
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not 3 carats! Ordered a 3ct rd & got a 2ct did not exchange because no way to be sure I would get a 3ct. Over all quality of ring way below standards of past purchases.
Date published: 2017-10-09
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Awesome Ring!!! I just got this ring today and I love it!!! It is very believable as if it were a real diamond!!! I got the ascher cut and it is stunning!!!
Date published: 2017-09-14
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful & Large Looks just as beautiful as my diamonds. Big, beautiful, & a great price
Date published: 2017-07-13
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Pretty, classic I purchased a size 6 3 carat princess cut. Size of band was perfect, the size of carat was not. I felt it was unrealistic for my lifestyle, so exchanged for a 2 carat. The stone kept waying the stone over to one side. But, for the price and all the options in stones, you really can have any option you choose. The setting was nice, but one corner was off set compared to the other 3. I was replacing my real wedding set because my band was sized too small and saudered. This is perfect, everyday. I would definitley order more stone shapes in this ring. The value is phenominal! The 3 carat princess looks bigger than the 2 carat cushion I also ordered in this ring. Returned the cushion, and replaced the 3 carat princess with a 2 carat.
Date published: 2017-07-12
Rated 5 out of 5 by from STUNNING I purchased the ?oval cut in this ring. WOW, it is beautiful!!! It does not go unnoticed on your hand. It is such a compliment to other jewelry you may be wearing as well, such as bracelets or watches. I highly recommend!!!
Date published: 2017-06-30
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Even my husband loved it! I bought this ring in the pear shaped 3 carat because I wanted something to wear when I take my engagement ring to be cleaned. I have a gorgeous pear shaped morganite but it does cloud up from time to time so I thought why not get something I can wear when my engagement ring is at the jewelers. I put this ring on my finger and my husband said " Wow! that's beautiful" and he is right it's a gorgeous ring. The only draw back is that my wedding band is rose gold and though it's a slight difference I would prefer if the metals matched. I hope one day soon QVC you will sell this ring in rose gold because it's gorgeous.
Date published: 2017-06-13
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Disappointed I was really excited to receive this. When I got it, the band was completely scratched up and everything was filthy. It looks like there was rust on it. I returned it and I'm hoping for an exchange. Hoping the next one is better.
Date published: 2017-06-07
  • y_2017, m_11, d_17, h_20
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_45
  • loc_, sid_J326506, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc