J331187

Diamonique 3.00 cttw Princess Lever Back Earrings, 14K

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail
$97.00

Comparable Retail Value: $105.00

$61.00

or 4 Easy Pays of $15.25

+ S&H and tax

Option:  
Description
Always the one. With a princess-cut cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamond set in a bezel of bright, glossy gold, these lever backs are the earrings you'll reach for today and tomorrow.

  • 14K gold
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 3.00 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Bezel-set, princess-cut Diamonique simulated diamond; polished finish
  • Lever backs, for pierced ears only
  • Measures approximately 1"L x 1/4"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 3.00 cttw Princess Lever Back Earrings, 14K is rated 1.8 out of 5 by 8.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Broken I have wore these and they broke. Poor quality and too thin. Sorry. They are going back...
Date published: 2017-05-10
Rated 1 out of 5 by from NOT A Winner Wore less than one full day...felt something irritating back of ear...the lever back does not close properly. I knew they were flimsy looking, but hoped they would be OK. THEY ARE NOT. Poor, poor quality.
Date published: 2017-03-25
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Thin wire for the hook Quality is just not there. The lever back metal is just a thin wire that is very fragile. I purchased the princess cut in white gold and one stone fell of the wire into my hand as soon as I took it out of the plastic bag. The other earring was warped so bad the wire did not meet in the back where it is supposed to clip. Definitely not worth the price, even a sale price.
Date published: 2016-08-27
Rated 2 out of 5 by from They do look cheap, I'm sorry to say I knew they would be small, but not THAT small. For gold, these are so small and fragile, I'm not comfortable wearing them on a regular basis, I don't think they could stand up to daily wear. As a result, I'm sending these back, sadly.
Date published: 2016-08-26
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Severely Disappointed :( I was so excited to get these earrings because it was shown so beautifully on air. I received them yesterday and there are so many things wrong with them. The workmanship is very poor. First, the setting is defective on both earrings. 3 of the edges are smooth and one edge is all crooked. The setting in the back is also so sharp, that it would be very easy to cut someone. Also, as some other reviewers mentioned, there is barely any sparkle. In fact, one of the stones looks cloudy. These are going back immediately.
Date published: 2016-08-26
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Diamonique Sparkles but 14k gold is disappointment The diamonique 3 ct stone sparkles, but the 14k gold wires on these earrings are so thin, that I fear, with constant wear, will surely break. I expected A stronger wire & lever back on this earring for the price point. I am still debating if I will keep them.
Date published: 2016-08-26
Rated 1 out of 5 by from VERY CHEAP Although I knew they would be small.. the problem I have is the metal is so thin and cheap looking. mostly around the stone. it looks as if you drop one on the floor it will bend and the stone will pop !! I purchased the yellow. I also purchased the round and the pear I hope they are better but we will see. I did purchase the 14k princess studs and they are fabulous
Date published: 2016-08-23
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Princess is just ho-hum I loved the look of these on air, but the princess style doesn't wow me: there is just very little sparkle. I bought something similar about ten years ago, loved them, but as one earring broke, I was hoping these would be as nice. No. Back they go.
Date published: 2016-08-22
  • y_2017, m_8, d_18, h_17
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_1.0.0-hotfix-1
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_8
  • loc_, sid_J331187, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc