J321142

Diamonique 100-Facet Cushion Bridal Ring Set, Platinum Clad

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail
$93.50

Retail Value: $110.00

$88.73

or 6 Easy Pays of $14.78

+ S&H and tax

Option:  
Description
"I do!" This cubic zirconia Diamonique simulated diamond bridal ring set has you all set to ask your love the most important question you may ever ask in your life. The 100-facet Diamonique(R) simulated diamond engagement ring and Diamonique simulated diamond eternity band are the only things that will get her to take her eyes off you.

Platinum Clad(R) sterling silver is polished sterling silver plated with platinum to create a timeless look at a fraction of the cost of platinum.

For more details on this ring's fit, please refer to the Ring Size Guide above.

  • Includes engagement ring and wedding band
  • Brightly polished platinum plated over sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weights are approximate: Engagement ring 3.00 carats; Eternity band 1.30 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • 100-facet, prong-set Diamonique simulated diamond at center of engagement ring; eternity band alternates round and baguette, channel-set Diamonique simulated diamonds
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; due to the special nature of the plating process, QVC does not recommend resizing by a jeweler
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 100-Facet Cushion Bridal Ring Set, Platinum Clad is rated 3.6 out of 5 by 161.
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Looks and feels like tin Very disappointing compared to the Diamonique of 15 or 20 years ago. The quality of the stone and the metal is just lacking. I would rather pay double or triple and have the old quality....I hope you listen-up QVC. Not everyone is a fan of the Walmart effect.
Date published: 2017-09-09
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Beautiful! I absolutely LOVE this ring, but the stone is just way too big! :(
Date published: 2017-08-28
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love The Stone I loved the beautiful center stone with so much sparkle yet simple. I took it to my local jewelers and had the three carat stone put into a 14K yellow gold setting. Unbelievably lovely. Didn't care for the band ring.
Date published: 2017-06-08
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Beautiful ring set Ordered this as a substitute for my wedding set which is now in safe keeping. Love the sparkle and shine. None of my family or friends have even noticed that this is a different set than my true wedding diamonds! Only reason for not giving 5 stars is that I'm hesitant about the platinum clad. It's already getting scratched on the bottom of the solitaire and have only had it about 2 months. Had purchased some platinum clad a few years ago and it scratched and started to wear off. Hopefully things have changed since then because II really love this set and would like to wear it for at least a couple of years.
Date published: 2017-04-19
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Very nice Simple yet nice ! A lovely set you can wear everyday and not have to worry about.
Date published: 2017-03-29
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Beautiful I purchased this ring a year ago and I'm in love with my ring. The only reason I did not gave a five stars is because I wish it was in white gold. If they ever make it in gold I will purchase this ring with no hesitation.
Date published: 2017-02-05
Rated 3 out of 5 by from 1 Out of 2 Should Not be Acceptable I love the solitaire 3ct ring. It sparkles beautifully and has that clean style that I wanted. However, the band is a huge disappointment. It's dull, and insignificant. The stones are so tiny the sterling band around them seem to cast a shadow on them. So the price for just the solitaire does not make this a good purchase because now I need to find an eternity band that will truly go with this. I don't even like the band alone on another finger because it just looks so cheap.
Date published: 2017-01-05
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Not real looking This ring set looked much better on TV then in person ? Had to return them .
Date published: 2016-12-05
  • y_2017, m_9, d_19, h_19
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_161
  • loc_, sid_J321142, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc