Diamonique 100-Facet 2.00 cttw Stud Earrings, Platinum Clad

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail

When can simple be stunning? When a pair of stud earrings sparkle with round, clear, 100-facet cubic zirconia Diamonique(R) simulated diamonds.

Platinum Clad(R) sterling silver is polished sterling silver plated with platinum to create a timeless look at a fraction of the cost of platinum.

  • Brightly polished platinum plated over sterling silver
  • Total Diamonique simulated diamond weight is approximately 2.00 carats; simulated diamonds are cubic zirconia
  • Stud earrings with prong-set, round, clear, 100-facet Diamonique simulated diamonds
  • Post and clutch, for pierced ears only
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 1/4"W
  • Gift box
  • Made in China/Thailand

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Diamonique 100-Facet 2.00 cttw Stud Earrings, Platinum Clad is rated 4.2 out of 5 by 387.
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Beautiful stones--post was crooked I have purchased quite a bit of Diamonique and know it to be excellent quality. The stones of these earrings were beautiful with lots of sparkle. I had to send the earrings back though because the post was bent/crooked. I don't like to return things and would have even just let the crooked post slide if it didn't keep the earring from laying properly on the ear. I don't think that these should have made it past Quality Control. I had a pair of 1/4 ct studs with the same problem. They would be 5 stars if not for that defect. Too bad. I still love Diamonique and think that these are beautiful earrings.
Date published: 2017-08-05
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Beautiful but... Diamonique earrings I've ordered in the past have come beautifully packaged and included the backs. Disappointed that the packaging was cheap and mangled inside the box. They didn't come with proper earring backs. I'll have to either purchase backs separately or rob another pair which is upsetting.
Date published: 2017-08-02
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Inferior setting Too bad the quality of the setting doesn't have the same standards as the diamonique. The butterfly clutches are so thin and flimsy they don't grip the post and fell off when I took the earrings out of the box. To replace these would cost more than the earrings. On the positive, the 100 facet stones are brilliant. I'd gladly pay more for these earrings if you had better quality settings. I'm sending these back. QVC, you need to step up your quality control!
Date published: 2017-08-01
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautiful Just received this pair and they are beautiful. The 100 facet gives them so much sparkle. I am going to gift my sister with these for her birthday and I know she's going to love them.
Date published: 2017-05-26
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Stunning I really love the 100-facet collection. These earrings sparkle like crazy. The 1 carat in each ear is just the right size. I am a little concerned about the post not breaking as it seems a little fragile, but I'm hoping for the best. Please make more diamonique in the 100 facets - it rocks!
Date published: 2017-05-17
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Pretty I'm tired of ordering a product getting it home and having to send it back because of poor quality in hardware
Date published: 2017-05-07
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Gorgeous...but the Diamonique 100-Facet 2.00 cttw Studs ae believable and incredibly full of fire...one post was badly bent as the padded mailer looks like it was run over by a truck and the gift box was semi-crushed. these were displayed in a gift box not in a standard hard hinged earring box...QVC, spend the extra dollar and ship these in the proper display boxes. had to return and was unable to give as a gift. I also ordered these in the 1.50 cttw and these arrived in a proper earring box.
Date published: 2017-04-29
Rated 1 out of 5 by from What happened to the quality? I've had Diamonique stud earrings for decades. I ordered a new set because I lost one. Unfortunately, both pairs that arrived were defective. The first pair the posts and friction backs were bent horribly, so I sent them back for a replacement pair. The next pair that arrived - one of the stones was loose in the prong setting. I'm so disappointed. Neither pair came in a box, just plastic bags. What a shame. Thank goodness I found the old one I lost. The quality WAS there at one time. My old pair are going strong after years and years.
Date published: 2017-04-26
  • y_2017, m_8, d_12, h_23
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_1.0.0-hotfix-1
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_387
  • loc_, sid_J263818, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc