J335114

Baguette Diamond Ring, Sterling, 4/10 cttw, by Affinity

Previously recorded videos may contain expired pricing, exclusivity claims, or promotional offers.

product thumbnail
$268.00

Option:  
Description
A new take on the diamond ring. From Affinity, this sterling silver beauty glistens with baguette white diamonds in a stunning crossover design. From Affinity(R) Diamond Jewelry.

  • Sterling silver
  • Total diamond weight is approximately 4/10 carat; diamond weights are minimum weights
  • Crossover design with rows of channel-set, white baguette diamond; white rhodium at diamond areas; highly polished, split tapered shank
  • Sizes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
  • Measures approximately 1/4"L x 3/4"W
  • Imported

Delivery Date Estimate

Reviews & Community QA

Baguette Diamond Ring, Sterling, 4/10 cttw, by Affinity is rated 2.5 out of 5 by 8.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Baguette Ring The stones sparkle. I really like the style. I stacked it next to the Heart Ring I purchased from QVC. It makes a very Unique and Beautiful Look!!! The match is perfect. Thanks QVC for my finger wrapped in Diamonds!!! I have searched a long time for this look.....
Date published: 2017-12-06
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Not Very Nice Got this ring for my wife. She was very dissatisfied no sparkle very dull sent it right back definitely can't recommend.
Date published: 2017-04-26
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Better than expected Because of all the negative reviews, I considered cancelling my waitlist as it is a gift for my daughter's 40th. birthday in April. Fortunately I wasn't quick enough and the ring was sent. To my utter surprise it's beautiful - the diamonds sparkle and I don't feel the setting is overpowering. For what it's worth, if you are contemplating this purchase, I would recommend it. I have purchased several Affinity items and have never been disappointed.
Date published: 2017-03-10
Rated 1 out of 5 by from DIAMONDS NOT AN AFFINITY LOOK!! I have loved the other rings I have by Affinity...not this dull diamond look that is found in this ring. I think the silver bars overpowers the setting of the stones, also. So disappointed because I have always wanted a good baguette diamond ring. I thought, I had found one in this purchase. I have returned this purchase.
Date published: 2017-01-30
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Nice ring I can see I'm in the minority, but I like the ring. I like the substantial setting and my diamonds do shine. It is a nice everyday ring. If you want a large really shiny ring, you would be better off with Diamonique.
Date published: 2017-01-24
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Save Your Money Teeny tiny, lifeless diamonds in heavy sterling setting that totally overwhelms any fire these stones might have. This ring actually looks like fake diamonds they are so dull. If you want a "diamond" ring set in sterling, buy Diamonique. Way more bang for the buck.
Date published: 2017-01-24
Rated 1 out of 5 by from So Sad The design is sophisticated and the diamonds are lovely. BUT - unless you wear it in direct sunlight or happen to have a spotlight trained on your finger (or TV studio lighting), the sterling silver bars completely overwhelm the baguettes. There's lots of flash, but that's just the light reflecting off the sterling bars between each cluster of baguettes. The brilliance and refracted colors of the diamonds are totally lost. If they were to redesign this ring and reduce the size of those silver bars, I'd buy it again in a heartbeat. Maybe. Seems that I've had to return a lot of recent purchases because of defects or simply not looking as good in person as they did on TV. All that S&H (with the exception of defective merchandise) and hassle is starting to get old. So Sad.
Date published: 2017-01-23
Rated 1 out of 5 by from WHERE IS THE SPARKLE? 1 STAR FOR THE DESIGN BUT NO SPARKLE AT ALL.....NONE... ZIP....ZERO.....NADA PUT IT NEXT TO THE DIAMONIQUE BIG MISTAKE DIAMONIQUE HAS LOADS OF SPARKLE LOADS OF COLOR ALSO PUT NEXT TO PAVE RING FROM AFFINITY THAT SPARKLES LIKE CRAZY NOTHING TOO BAD PURCHASED 2 BOTH THE SAME NOTHING! BOTH GOING BACK
Date published: 2017-01-21
  • y_2018, m_2, d_18, h_20
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.7
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_8
  • loc_, sid_J335114, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=FEATURED, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_qvc